In 2020 Volvo XC90 horsepower was between 235 and 310 hp or 173 and 228 kW.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to weight ratio in 2020 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T6 |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
+23% | 62 hp / 46 kw | 78 hp / 57 kw | 155 points |
2.0 B5 |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+51% | 47 hp / 35 kw | 59 hp / 43 kw | 117.5 points |
2.0 T8 TwEn |
303 hp / 223 kw
(+75%) |
+24% | 51 hp / 37 kw | 76 hp / 56 kw | 151.5 points |
2.0 T5 |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+29% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 46 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 155 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 B5 |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 117.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 TwEn |
Power (difference from average) |
303 hp / 223 kw
(+75%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 151.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
In 2015 Volvo XC90 horsepower was between 190 and 320 hp or 140 and 235 kW.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D5 |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+51% | 47 hp / 35 kw | 59 hp / 43 kw | 117.5 points |
2.0 D4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
2.0 T8 |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+20% | 64 hp / 47 kw | 80 hp / 59 kw | 160 points |
2.0 T6 |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+20% | 64 hp / 47 kw | 80 hp / 59 kw | 160 points |
2.0 T5 |
254 hp / 187 kw
(+47%) |
+27% | 51 hp / 37 kw | 64 hp / 47 kw | 127 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 117.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 80 hp / 59 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 160 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 80 hp / 59 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 160 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
254 hp / 187 kw
(+47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 127 points |
In 2007 Volvo XC90 horsepower was between 163 and 315 hp or 120 and 232 kW.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 D4 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
2.4 D3 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
3.2i |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
+26% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 74.4 points |
2.4d |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
+54% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 77.1 points |
3.2 |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
+24% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 75.9 points |
2.4 D5 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+52% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 83.3 points |
4.4 V8 |
315 hp / 232 kw
(+82%) |
+28% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 71.6 points |
2.5i |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+34% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 84 points |
4.4i |
315 hp / 232 kw
(+82%) |
+28% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 71.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 3.2i |
Power (difference from average) |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.1 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
315 hp / 232 kw
(+82%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84 points |
Vehicle | 4.4i |
Power (difference from average) |
315 hp / 232 kw
(+82%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.6 points |
In 2003 Volvo XC90 horsepower was between 163 and 272 hp or 120 and 200 kW.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC90 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 24V |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+28% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 97.1 points |
2.5 20V |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+34% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 84 points |
3.2 |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
+24% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 75.9 points |
2.9 T6 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+28% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 93.8 points |
2.4 D3 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
2.4 TDi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 97.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 TDi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |