In 2018 Volvo XC60 horsepower was between 150 and 320 hp or 110 and 235 kW.
Volvo XC60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T6 |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
+23% | 62 hp / 46 kw | 78 hp / 57 kw | 155 points |
2.0 T8 |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
+20% | 64 hp / 47 kw | 80 hp / 59 kw | 160 points |
2.0 T5 |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+29% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
2.0 D4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
2.0 T4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+37% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
2.0 D3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 T8 Twin Engine |
303 hp / 223 kw
(+75%) |
+24% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 76 hp / 56 kw | 151.5 points |
2.0 D5 |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+51% | 47 hp / 35 kw | 59 hp / 43 kw | 117.5 points |
2.0 B4 |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
+53% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 98.5 points |
2.0 B5 |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+51% | 47 hp / 35 kw | 59 hp / 43 kw | 117.5 points |
Polestar 2.0 T8 |
317 hp / 233 kw
(+83%) |
+26% | 63 hp / 47 kw | 79 hp / 58 kw | 158.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 46 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 155 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 |
Power (difference from average) |
320 hp / 235 kw
(+85%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 80 hp / 59 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 160 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 Twin Engine |
Power (difference from average) |
303 hp / 223 kw
(+75%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 151.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 117.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 B4 |
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 98.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 B5 |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 117.5 points |
Vehicle | Polestar 2.0 T8 |
Power (difference from average) |
317 hp / 233 kw
(+83%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 63 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 79 hp / 58 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 158.5 points |
In 2014 Volvo XC60 horsepower was between 150 and 306 hp or 110 and 225 kW.
Volvo XC60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+55% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 90.5 points |
2.0 D3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 D4 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+59% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 81.5 points |
2.4 D4 |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+57% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 75.4 points |
2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+49% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 89.6 points |
3.0 T6 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+31% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.3 points |
2.0 T5 |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
+30% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 122.5 points |
2.0 T6 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+24% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 77 hp / 56 kw | 153 points |
2.5 T5 |
254 hp / 187 kw
(+47%) |
+29% | 51 hp / 37 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 Bi-Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D4 |
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 Bi-Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 122.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 77 hp / 56 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 153 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
254 hp / 187 kw
(+47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.6 points |
In 2009 Volvo XC60 horsepower was between 163 and 304 hp or 120 and 224 kW.
Volvo XC60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Volvo XC60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 D3 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+61% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
2.4 D5 |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+49% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 89.6 points |
2.4D |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
3.0 T6 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+31% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.3 points |
3.2 |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
+24% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 75.9 points |
2.4D DRIVe |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+58% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 72.9 points |
2.0 D3 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+59% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 81.5 points |
2.0 Drive |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+59% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 81.5 points |
2.0 T5 |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+25% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.4D |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4D DRIVe |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Drive |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |