In 2019 Volvo S60 horsepower was between 190 and 318 hp or 140 and 234 kW.
Volvo S60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2019 is shown in the chart.
Volvo S60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T5 |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+29% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
2.0 T6 |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
+23% | 62 hp / 46 kw | 78 hp / 57 kw | 155 points |
Polestar 2.0 T8 |
318 hp / 234 kw
(+84%) |
+26% | 64 hp / 47 kw | 80 hp / 59 kw | 159 points |
2.0 T8 Twin Engine |
303 hp / 223 kw
(+75%) |
+24% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 76 hp / 56 kw | 151.5 points |
2.0 T6 Twin Engine |
253 hp / 186 kw
(+46%) |
+28% | 51 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 47 kw | 126.5 points |
2.0 T4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+37% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
310 hp / 228 kw
(+79%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 62 hp / 46 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 155 points |
Vehicle | Polestar 2.0 T8 |
Power (difference from average) |
318 hp / 234 kw
(+84%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 80 hp / 59 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 159 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 Twin Engine |
Power (difference from average) |
303 hp / 223 kw
(+75%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 151.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 Twin Engine |
Power (difference from average) |
253 hp / 186 kw
(+46%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 47 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 126.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
In 2015 Volvo S60 horsepower was between 150 and 254 hp or 110 and 187 kW.
Volvo S60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Volvo S60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 D5 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+55% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 79.2 points |
2.5 T5 |
254 hp / 187 kw
(+47%) |
+29% | 51 hp / 37 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.6 points |
2.0 D4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
2.0 D3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 79.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
254 hp / 187 kw
(+47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 2014 Volvo S60 horsepower was between 115 and 367 hp or 85 and 270 kW.
Volvo S60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Volvo S60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T5 |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
+-36% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 122.5 points |
3.0 T6 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+31% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.3 points |
1.6 T3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 93.8 points |
2.4 D5 |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+51% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 89.6 points |
1.6 D2 |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.6 T4 |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 112.5 points |
2.0 D4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
2.0 D3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+53% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 T6 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+24% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 77 hp / 56 kw | 153 points |
2.0 D2 |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+57% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 60 points |
1.6 T4F |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 112.5 points |
Polestar 3.0 T6 |
350 hp / 257 kw
(+102%) |
+30% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 58 hp / 43 kw | 116.7 points |
1.5 T2 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+45% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 81.3 points |
1.5 T3 |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
+39% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 101.3 points |
2.0 T3 |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
+39% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 76 points |
2.0 T4 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+37% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
Polestar 2.0 T6 |
367 hp / 270 kw
(+112%) |
+22% | 73 hp / 54 kw | 92 hp / 68 kw | 183.5 points |
2.0 D5 |
225 hp / 165 kw
(+30%) |
+52% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 56 hp / 41 kw | 112.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
245 hp / 180 kw
(+42%) |
Power to torque ratio | -36 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 122.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 T3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 D2 |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4 |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 112.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 77 hp / 56 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 153 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D2 |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4F |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 112.5 points |
Vehicle | Polestar 3.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
350 hp / 257 kw
(+102%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 116.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 T2 |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 45 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 T3 |
Power (difference from average) |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T3 |
Power (difference from average) |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T4 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | Polestar 2.0 T6 |
Power (difference from average) |
367 hp / 270 kw
(+112%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 73 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 92 hp / 68 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 183.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
225 hp / 165 kw
(+30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 112.5 points |
In 2011 Volvo S60 horsepower was between 115 and 304 hp or 85 and 224 kW.
Volvo S60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2011 is shown in the chart.
Volvo S60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Drive |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+57% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
2.4 D5 |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+49% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 89.6 points |
2.4 D5 AWD |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+51% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 89.6 points |
2.0 D3 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+59% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 81.5 points |
3.0 T5 |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
+31% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.3 points |
2.0 T5 |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+25% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
1.6 T4F |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 112.5 points |
1.6 T4 |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 112.5 points |
1.6 T3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+38% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 93.8 points |
2.0 T |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+32% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 Drive |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 AWD |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
304 hp / 224 kw
(+76%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4F |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 112.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4 |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 112.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 T3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Power (difference from average) |
203 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.5 points |
In 2001 Volvo S60 horsepower was between 130 and 300 hp or 96 and 221 kW.
Volvo S60 horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Volvo S60 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i 20V AWD |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+34% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 84 points |
2.0 T |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+25% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 90 points |
2.4 D |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+54% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 54.2 points |
2.4i 20V T5 |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
+26% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 52 hp / 38 kw | 108.3 points |
2.4i 20V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+26% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 70.8 points |
2.4 T |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+30% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 83.3 points |
2.5i 20V R |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+25% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
T5 2.3 20V |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+24% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 108.7 points |
2.4 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+30% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 83.3 points |
2.4 20V |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+34% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 84 points |
2.0 i T |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+18% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 90 points |
2.4 D5 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V AWD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4i 20V T5 |
Power (difference from average) |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 108.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.4i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 T |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i 20V R |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | T5 2.3 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 108.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i T |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |