In 2010 Volvo C30 horsepower was between 114 and 177 hp or 84 and 130 kW.
Volvo C30 horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Volvo C30 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D4 |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+56% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 88.5 points |
2.0 D3 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+57% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 75 points |
1.6 D2 |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
+58% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.3 points |
1.6 |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
+58% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 D2 |
Power (difference from average) |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.3 points |
In 2007 Volvo C30 horsepower was between 100 and 220 hp or 74 and 162 kW.
Volvo C30 horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Volvo C30 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i 20V T5 |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+31% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 88 points |
2.4 i 20V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+26% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 70.8 points |
1.6D |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+55% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 68.1 points |
1.6 i 16V |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+33% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.8 i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+24% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0D |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+22% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.4 D5 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+52% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 67.9 points |
2.4D5 |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+49% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V T5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.6D |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0D |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.4D5 |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |