In 1991 Volvo 960 horsepower was between 115 and 204 hp or 85 and 150 kW.
Volvo 960 horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Volvo 960 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 TD |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+49% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 47.9 points |
2.5 i 24V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+26% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
2.0 i 16V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+32% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
3.0 i 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+24% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |
In 1991 Volvo 960 horsepower was between 115 and 204 hp or 85 and 150 kW.
Volvo 960 horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Volvo 960 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 TD |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+49% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 47.9 points |
2.5 i V6 24V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+26% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 68 points |
2.0 i 16V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+32% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
3.0 i 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+24% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |