In 1985 Volvo 740 horsepower was between 82 and 165 hp or 60 and 121 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 Turbo |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 Diesel |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 16V |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1985 Volvo 740 horsepower was between 82 and 159 hp or 60 and 117 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
151 hp / 111 kw
(-13%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 TD Interc. |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 16V |
159 hp / 117 kw
(-8%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 Turbo |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 Diesel |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 Turbo-Diesel |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
151 hp / 111 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 TD Interc. |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
159 hp / 117 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 Turbo-Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |