In 1982 Volvo 340-360 horsepower was between 54 and 102 hp or 40 and 75 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 Diesel |
54 hp / 40 kw
(-69%) |
- | - | - | |
1.7 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | - | - | |
1.4 |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
54 hp / 40 kw
(-69%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1976 Volvo 340-360 horsepower was between 54 and 122 hp or 40 and 90 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 |
63 hp / 46 kw
(-64%) |
- | - | - | |
2.1 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - | |
1.7 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 Diesel |
54 hp / 40 kw
(-69%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
63 hp / 46 kw
(-64%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.1 |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
54 hp / 40 kw
(-69%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |