In 1974 Volvo 240 horsepower was between 79 and 155 hp or 58 and 114 kW.
Volvo 240 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
103 hp / 76 kw
(-40%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 Diesel |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | 32.9 points |
2.1 |
123 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - | |
2.1 Turbo |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
- | - | - | |
2.7 GLT6 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
103 hp / 76 kw
(-40%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 32.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 |
Power (difference from average) |
123 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 GLT6 |
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1974 Volvo 240 horsepower was between 82 and 155 hp or 60 and 114 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 GLT6 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
- | - | - | |
2.1 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
97 hp / 71 kw
(-44%) |
- | - | - | |
2.1 Turbo |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
- | - | - | |
2.4 Diesel |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.7 GLT6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.1 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
97 hp / 71 kw
(-44%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.1 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
155 hp / 114 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |