In 1986 Vauxhall Carlton Mk horsepower was between 73 and 377 hp or 54 and 277 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
3000 CAT |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
- | 35 hp / 26 kw | - | - |
3000 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
- | 40 hp / 29 kw | - | - |
3000 |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
- | 31 hp / 23 kw | - | - |
3.6 24V Lotus |
377 hp / 277 kw
(+118%) |
- | 75 hp / 55 kw | - | - |
2.6i |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
1.8 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
1.8 S |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
1.8 N |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
2.0 |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.0i |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | 24 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
2.2 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
2.3 D |
73 hp / 54 kw
(-58%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
3.0 3000 24V |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
- | 41 hp / 30 kw | - | - |
2.4i |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
3.0 3000 |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
- | 35 hp / 26 kw | - | - |
2.3 TD Interc. |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3000 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3000 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3000 |
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.6 24V Lotus |
Power (difference from average) |
377 hp / 277 kw
(+118%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.6i |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 S |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 N |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
73 hp / 54 kw
(-58%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 3000 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 3000 |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD Interc. |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1986 Vauxhall Carlton Mk horsepower was between 73 and 200 hp or 54 and 147 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
- | 35 hp / 26 kw | - | - |
1.8i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
1.8 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
1.8 N |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
2.0 |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
1.8 S |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
3.0 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
- | 40 hp / 29 kw | - | - |
2.6i |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
2.4i |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | 25 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
2.3 TD Interc. |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.2 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
2.3 D |
73 hp / 54 kw
(-58%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
2.0i |
99 hp / 73 kw
(-43%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 N |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 S |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.6i |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD Interc. |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
73 hp / 54 kw
(-58%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
99 hp / 73 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1982 Vauxhall Carlton Mk horsepower was between 71 and 115 hp or 52 and 85 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 D |
71 hp / 52 kw
(-59%) |
- | 14 hp / 10 kw | - | - |
2.0 S |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.2 i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
1.8 S |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
71 hp / 52 kw
(-59%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 S |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1978 Vauxhall Carlton Mk horsepower was between 71 and 115 hp or 52 and 85 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 D |
71 hp / 52 kw
(-59%) |
- | 14 hp / 10 kw | - | - |
2.2i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.0 S |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.0i |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
- | 22 hp / 16 kw | - | - |
1.8 S |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
71 hp / 52 kw
(-59%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 S |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |