In 2009 Toyota Matrix horsepower was between 160 and 160 hp or 118 and 118 kW.
Toyota Matrix horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Toyota Matrix horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+29% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 66.7 points |
S 2.4 |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+29% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | S 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
In 2003 Toyota Matrix horsepower was between 124 and 183 hp or 91 and 135 kW.
Toyota Matrix horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Toyota Matrix horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
+23% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 68.9 points |
1.8 i 16V |
183 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
+-4% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 101.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
183 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
Power to torque ratio | -4 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.7 points |