In 2000 Toyota Celica horsepower was between 143 and 192 hp or 105 and 141 kW.
Toyota Celica horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Toyota Celica horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 VT-i 16V |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+16% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 79.4 points |
1.8 i GT- R |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+-1% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 101.1 points |
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
+-7% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 106.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 VT-i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 79.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i GT- R |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | -1 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport |
Power (difference from average) |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
Power to torque ratio | -7 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 106.7 points |
In 1994 Toyota Celica horsepower was between 116 and 242 hp or 85 and 178 kW.
Toyota Celica horsepower to weight ratio in 1994 is shown in the chart.
Toyota Celica horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Turbo 4WD |
242 hp / 178 kw
(+40%) |
+20% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 61 hp / 45 kw | 121 points |
1.8 i 16V |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+25% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 64.4 points |
2.0 16V |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 i 16V |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+6% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 87.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
242 hp / 178 kw
(+40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 121 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 6 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.5 points |
In 1994 Toyota Celica horsepower was 136 hp or 100 kW
Toyota Celica horsepower to weight ratio in 1994 is shown in the chart.
Toyota Celica horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i GT |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+31% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 61.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.2i GT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.8 points |
In 1990 Toyota Celica horsepower was between 105 and 208 hp or 77 and 153 kW.
Toyota Celica horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Toyota Celica horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+26% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 63.9 points |
2.0i 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+25% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
1.6 STi |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+26% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 65.6 points |
2.0 i 16V |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
+16% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 78 points |
2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD |
208 hp / 153 kw
(+20%) |
+24% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 52 hp / 38 kw | 104 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 STi |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
208 hp / 153 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 104 points |
In 1990 Toyota Celica horsepower was 156 hp or 115 kW
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GTi |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GTi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
156 hp / 115 kw
(-10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1987 Toyota Celica horsepower was 150 hp or 110 kW
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GT |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1985 Toyota Celica horsepower was between 86 and 185 hp or 63 and 136 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 GT |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 GT |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 GT 16V |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 Turbo 4x4 |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 GT 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1977 Toyota Celica horsepower was between 75 and 124 hp or 55 and 91 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 GT |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 ST |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 LT |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 GT |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 XT |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 GT |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 ST |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 LT |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 XT |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1971 Toyota Celica horsepower was between 75 and 107 hp or 55 and 79 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 ST |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 LT |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 GT |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 ST |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 LT |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |