In 2019 SsangYong Musso horsepower was 181 hp or 133 kW
SsangYong Musso horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 e-XDi |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+57% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 82.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 e-XDi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.3 points |
In 2018 SsangYong Musso horsepower was between 181 and 224 hp or 133 and 165 kW.
SsangYong Musso horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
SsangYong Musso horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 e-XGDi |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+36% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 56 hp / 41 kw | 112 points |
2.2 e-XDi |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+55% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 82.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 e-XGDi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 112 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 e-XDi |
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.3 points |
In 1993 SsangYong Musso horsepower was between 80 and 220 hp or 59 and 162 kW.
SsangYong Musso horsepower to weight ratio in 1993 is shown in the chart.
SsangYong Musso horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 D |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+50% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 32.8 points |
3.2 i 24V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+29% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 68.8 points |
2.9 TD |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
+48% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 44.5 points |
2.3 i 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+31% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 60.9 points |
2.3 TD |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+51% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 43.9 points |
2.3 D |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
+47% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 34.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 32.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 44.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34.8 points |