In 2011 SsangYong Chairman horsepower was between 197 and 306 hp or 145 and 225 kW.
SsangYong Chairman horsepower to weight ratio in 2011 is shown in the chart.
SsangYong Chairman horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
+26% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 70.4 points |
3.6 |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+27% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 69.4 points |
3.2 |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+24% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 70 points |
5.0 V8 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+31% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 61.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.2 points |
In 1997 SsangYong Chairman horsepower was between 150 and 220 hp or 110 and 162 kW.
SsangYong Chairman horsepower to weight ratio in 1997 is shown in the chart.
SsangYong Chairman horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM400 2.3 i 16V |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+32% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 65.2 points |
CM600 L 3.2 i 24V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+28% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 68.8 points |
CM500 2.8 i 24V |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
+27% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 70.4 points |
CM600S 3.2 i 24V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+29% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | CM400 2.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.2 points |
Vehicle | CM600 L 3.2 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | CM500 2.8 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | CM600S 3.2 i 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |