In 2012 Seat Toledo horsepower was between 75 and 122 hp or 55 and 90 kW.
Seat Toledo horsepower to weight ratio in 2012 is shown in the chart.
Seat Toledo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 TDI |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+58% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 65.6 points |
1.2 TSI |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+37% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 91.7 points |
1.4 TSI |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+39% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 87.1 points |
1.0 TSI |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+41% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 95 points |
1.2 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+33% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.0 TSI |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2004 Seat Toledo horsepower was between 102 and 160 hp or 75 and 118 kW.
Seat Toledo horsepower to weight ratio in 2004 is shown in the chart.
Seat Toledo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDI |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+56% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 FSI |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+25% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.6 |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
+31% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 63.8 points |
1.8 TSI |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+-8% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 100 points |
1.9 TDI |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+58% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 55.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 FSI |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TSI |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | -8 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.3 points |
In 1999 Seat Toledo horsepower was between 90 and 180 hp or 66 and 132 kW.
Seat Toledo horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Seat Toledo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 V5 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+23% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 73.9 points |
1.9 TDI |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+55% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 47.4 points |
1.8 20V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+26% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
1.6 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+32% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.8 20VT |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+23% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 100 points |
1.6 16V |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+29% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 65.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 V5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 20VT |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.6 points |
In 1991 Seat Toledo horsepower was between 64 and 150 hp or 47 and 110 kW.
Seat Toledo horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Seat Toledo horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+30% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 63.1 points |
1.8 i |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+38% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
1.9 TDI |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+55% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 47.4 points |
1.8 16V |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
- | - | - | |
1.9 D |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
+55% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 35.8 points |
2.0 i 16V |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+17% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+31% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
1.6 MPi |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+32% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 62.5 points |
1.9 SDI |
64 hp / 47 kw
(-63%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
+44% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 18 hp / 13 kw | 43.8 points |
1.9 TD |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+46% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 39.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 MPi |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 SDI |
Power (difference from average) |
64 hp / 47 kw
(-63%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 43.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39.5 points |