In 1986 Saab 9000 horsepower was between 128 and 211 hp or 94 and 155 kW.
Saab 9000 horsepower to weight ratio in 1986 is shown in the chart.
Saab 9000 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 -16 Turbo |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
+40% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 84.8 points |
2.0 -16 Turbo |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 16V |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
+26% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 64 points |
2.0 - 16 Turbo CD |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+37% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 81.5 points |
2.0 - 16 Turbo |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+36% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 87.5 points |
2.3 - 16 |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+29% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 63.5 points |
2.0 -16 CD |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 - 16 CD |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+30% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 -16 Turbo CD |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 - 16 CDE |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+28% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 63.9 points |
2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+38% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 87 points |
3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
+22% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.3 points |
2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+39% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 73.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 -16 Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 Turbo CD |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 |
Power (difference from average) |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 CD |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 CD |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 Turbo CD |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CDE |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE |
Power (difference from average) |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.9 points |
In 1985 Saab 9000 horsepower was between 128 and 225 hp or 94 and 165 kW.
Saab 9000 horsepower to weight ratio in 1985 is shown in the chart.
Saab 9000 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 -16 Turbo |
172 hp / 127 kw
(-1%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 -16 |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 -16 CS |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 - 16 CS |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+26% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 - 16 ND Turbo |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+30% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 -16 Turbo CS |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 -16 Aero CS |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 -16 CS |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 - 16 CSE |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+28% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 63.9 points |
2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+39% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 73.9 points |
2.3 -16 Turbo CS |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
- | - | - | |
2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+38% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 87 points |
2.3 CS Aero |
225 hp / 165 kw
(+30%) |
+34% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 56 hp / 41 kw | 97.8 points |
3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
+22% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
172 hp / 127 kw
(-1%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 CS |
Power (difference from average) |
128 hp / 94 kw
(-26%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 CS |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 ND Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 Turbo CS |
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 -16 Aero CS |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 -16 CS |
Power (difference from average) |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CSE |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 -16 Turbo CS |
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 CS Aero |
Power (difference from average) |
225 hp / 165 kw
(+30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 97.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE |
Power (difference from average) |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |