In 1992 Rover 800 horsepower was between 118 and 200 hp or 87 and 147 kW.
Rover 800 horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Rover 800 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
827 24V |
169 hp / 124 kw
(-2%) |
+25% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 62.6 points |
825 Si |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+27% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 70 points |
825 SD |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 17 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 47.2 points |
820 Ti |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+17% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 100 points |
820 i Turbo |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+17% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 90 points |
820i |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+26% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 827 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
169 hp / 124 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.6 points |
Vehicle | 825 Si |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 825 SD |
Power (difference from average) |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.2 points |
Vehicle | 820 Ti |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 820 i Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90 points |
Vehicle | 820i |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In 1988 Rover 800 horsepower was between 118 and 200 hp or 87 and 147 kW.
Rover 800 horsepower to weight ratio in 1988 is shown in the chart.
Rover 800 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
827 Vitesse |
169 hp / 124 kw
(-2%) |
- | - | - | |
827 Vitesse/SLI |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
- | - | - | |
827 24V I/SI |
169 hp / 124 kw
(-2%) |
- | - | - | |
825 D/SD |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
- | - | - | |
820 Ti |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+17% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 100 points |
825 Si |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+27% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 70 points |
820 Sport |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
- | - | - | |
820 SI |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
- | - | - | |
820 i/Si |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
820 16V Turbo |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
- | - | - | |
820 I/SI |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+26% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 827 Vitesse |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
169 hp / 124 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 827 Vitesse/SLI |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 827 24V I/SI |
Power (difference from average) |
169 hp / 124 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 825 D/SD |
Power (difference from average) |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 Ti |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 825 Si |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 820 Sport |
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 SI |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 i/Si |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 I/SI |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In 1986 Rover 800 horsepower was between 100 and 197 hp or 74 and 145 kW.
Rover 800 horsepower to weight ratio in 1986 is shown in the chart.
Rover 800 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
820 16 V I/SI |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+21% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
827 SI/Sterling |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+22% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 65.6 points |
825 SI/Sterling |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
- | - | - | |
825 Si Lux |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+27% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 70 points |
825 D/SD |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 17 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 47.2 points |
820e |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | - | - | |
820 Sport |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
- | - | - | |
820 SI |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
- | - | - | |
820 I/SI |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+26% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
820 16V Turbo |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+17% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 90 points |
820 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 820 16 V I/SI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 827 SI/Sterling |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.6 points |
Vehicle | 825 SI/Sterling |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 825 Si Lux |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 825 D/SD |
Power (difference from average) |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.2 points |
Vehicle | 820e |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 Sport |
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 SI |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 820 I/SI |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 820 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90 points |
Vehicle | 820 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |