In 2001 Rover 75 horsepower was between 115 and 177 hp or 85 and 130 kW.
Rover 75 horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Rover 75 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 V6 |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+26% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 70.8 points |
1.8 |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.8 16V T |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+30% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 83.3 points |
2.0 CDT |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+56% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.0 CDTi |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+56% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 V6 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+19% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V T |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDT |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 1999 Rover 75 horsepower was between 115 and 177 hp or 85 and 130 kW.
Rover 75 horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Rover 75 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 V6 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+19% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 75 points |
1.8 |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
2.5 V6 |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+26% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 70.8 points |
1.8 16V T |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+30% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 83.3 points |
2.0 CDTi |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+56% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 CDT |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+56% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V T |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDT |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |