In 1996 Renault Safrane horsepower was between 113 and 190 hp or 83 and 140 kW.
Renault Safrane horsepower to weight ratio in 1996 is shown in the chart.
Renault Safrane horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 20V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+22% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 68.8 points |
2.0 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+25% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 71.6 points |
2.2 TDI |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+55% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 51.4 points |
2.9 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+29% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 20V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDI |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
In 1992 Renault Safrane horsepower was between 88 and 263 hp or 65 and 193 kW.
Renault Safrane horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Renault Safrane horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 TD |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+52% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 41.9 points |
2.2 |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
+25% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 62.3 points |
2.5 TD |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+53% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 44.8 points |
3.0 Biturbo 4x4 |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
+28% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 87.7 points |
3.0 V6 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
3.0 V6 4x4 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
137 hp / 101 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 44.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 Biturbo 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |