In 2012 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 150 and 238 hp or 110 and 175 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2012 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+56% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 Turbo |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+32% | 51 hp / 38 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 102 points |
3.5 V6 |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
+28% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 68 points |
3.0 V6 dCi |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+48% | 59 hp / 43 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 78.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.3 points |
In 2010 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 110 and 150 hp or 81 and 110 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | - | 65 points |
GT 2.0 dCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+56% | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | 75 points |
1.5 dCi |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+54% | 22 hp / 16 kw | - | 73.3 points |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+28% | 28 hp / 21 kw | - | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 73.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
In 2010 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 110 and 175 hp or 81 and 129 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 dCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+56% | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | 75 points |
2.0 dCi |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+51% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 87.5 points |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+28% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
1.5 dCi |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+54% | 22 hp / 16 kw | - | 73.3 points |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 73.3 points |
In 2008 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 150 and 238 hp or 110 and 175 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V Turbo |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+32% | 51 hp / 38 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 102.5 points |
2.0 dCi FAP |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+56% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+48% | 59 hp / 43 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 78.3 points |
3.5 V6 24V |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
+28% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In 2007 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 110 and 173 hp or 81 and 127 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+54% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 73.3 points |
1.6 16V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+27% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 68.8 points |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+28% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 dCi FAP |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
+54% | 35 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86.5 points |
2.0 16V Turbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
2.0 dCi FAP Turbo |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
+54% | 35 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.5 points |
In 2007 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 110 and 178 hp or 81 and 131 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+28% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
1.6 i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+24% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 71.9 points |
1.5 dCi |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+54% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 73.3 points |
2.0 16V Turbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
2.0 dCi FAP |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
+53% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 89 points |
Vehicle | 2,0 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Power (difference from average) |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 89 points |
In 2001 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 107 and 207 hp or 79 and 152 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+29% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0i 16V Turbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
2.2 dCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+53% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 68.2 points |
1.6 i 16V |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
+28% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 66.9 points |
1.9 dCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 63.2 points |
1.8 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+27% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
2.0 i 16V GT |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+32% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 102 points |
2.0 IDE 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+30% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 i T 16V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+39% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 82.5 points |
3.0 V6 24V |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V GT |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 IDE 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i T 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
In 2001 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 82 and 207 hp or 60 and 152 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 dCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+53% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 68.2 points |
1.5 dCi |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+56% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 54.7 points |
1.6 i 16V |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
+26% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 70 points |
1.8 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+27% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.9 dCi |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+56% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 63.2 points |
2.0 i 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+29% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 i 16V GT |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+32% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 102 points |
2.0 i T 16V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+39% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 82.5 points |
2.0 IDE 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+30% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 85 points |
3.0 V6 24V |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
112 hp / 82 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V GT |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i T 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 IDE 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
In 1995 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 83 and 190 hp or 61 and 140 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
+28% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 66.9 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+38% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
1.8 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+27% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.9 dCi |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 57.4 points |
1.9 dTi |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+51% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 51.6 points |
2.0 |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+33% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 56.5 points |
2.0 16V |
139 hp / 102 kw
(-20%) |
+25% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 73.2 points |
2.2 D |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
+42% | 17 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 37.7 points |
2.2 dT |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+55% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 51.4 points |
2.9 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+29% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 65.5 points |
3.0 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
139 hp / 102 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Power (difference from average) |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 dT |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |
In 1994 Renault Laguna horsepower was between 83 and 190 hp or 61 and 140 kW.
Renault Laguna horsepower to weight ratio in 1994 is shown in the chart.
Renault Laguna horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+29% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 65.5 points |
1.6 i 16V |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
+28% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 66.9 points |
1.8 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+27% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.9 dTi |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+51% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 51.6 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+38% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0 |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+33% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 56.5 points |
2.0 16V |
139 hp / 102 kw
(-20%) |
+24% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 73.2 points |
2.0 i 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+26% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.2 D |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
+42% | 17 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 37.7 points |
2.2 dT |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+55% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 51.4 points |
3.0 V6 RXE |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+28% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 56.7 points |
3.0 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
139 hp / 102 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Power (difference from average) |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 dT |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 RXE |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |