In 1989 Peugeot 605 horsepower was between 82 and 200 hp or 60 and 147 kW.
Peugeot 605 horsepower to weight ratio in 1989 is shown in the chart.
Peugeot 605 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Turbo |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.5 points |
2.1 TD 12V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 52.4 points |
3.0 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+29% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 55.7 points |
3.0 V6 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+29% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
+31% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 60.5 points |
2.0 16V |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
+27% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 66 points |
2.5 Turbo Diesel |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
+55% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 53.8 points |
2.1 D |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+43% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 39 points |
3.0 SV 24 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+23% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
121 hp / 89 kw
(-30%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 Turbo Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
129 hp / 95 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 D |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 43 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 39 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 SV 24 |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |