In 1997 Peugeot 406 horsepower was between 132 and 207 hp or 97 and 152 kW.
Peugeot 406 horsepower to weight ratio in 1997 is shown in the chart.
Peugeot 406 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
- | - | - | |
3.0 V6 |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+27% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 71.4 points |
2.2 HDi |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+58% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 60.5 points |
2.2 16V |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
+27% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 71.8 points |
3.0 V6 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+29% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 HDi |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.8 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
In 1996 Peugeot 406 horsepower was between 75 and 207 hp or 55 and 152 kW.
Peugeot 406 horsepower to weight ratio in 1996 is shown in the chart.
Peugeot 406 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 71.4 points |
1.9 D |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 HDI 90 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45 points |
2.0 HDI FAP |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 55 points |
3.0 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+29% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 65.5 points |
2.0 HDI 109 |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 54.5 points |
1.9 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 HPi |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.2 16V |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
+27% | 32 hp / 23 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 71.8 points |
2.0 Turbo |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.5 points |
2.0 16V |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+29% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 67.5 points |
1.8 i 16V |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+29% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 68.2 points |
2.2 HDi |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 60.5 points |
1.8 16V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+29% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 61.1 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 90 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI FAP |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 109 |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 HPi |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 HDi |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1995 Peugeot 406 horsepower was between 88 and 207 hp or 65 and 152 kW.
Peugeot 406 horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Peugeot 406 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
- | - | - | |
2.2 HDi |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+58% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 60.5 points |
1.6 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+32% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 55 points |
2.0 HDI |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+56% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 55 points | |
3.0 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
1.9 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+55% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 47.4 points |
1.8 16V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 HPi |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
3.0 V6 |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
+27% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 35 hp / 25 kw | 71.4 points |
2.1 TD 12V |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+56% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 51.9 points |
2.0 16V |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
- | - | - | |
2.2 16V |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
+27% | 32 hp / 23 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 71.8 points |
2.0 Turbo |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.5 points |
2.0 HDI 90 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+56% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45 points |
2.0 |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
+27% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 66 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 HDi |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 HPi |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
207 hp / 152 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 90 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66 points |