In 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 141 and 213 hp or 104 and 157 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1988 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 16V |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+23% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
3.1 V6 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+44% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 17 kw | 45.5 points |
3.4 V6 |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
+27% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 62.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.1 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.6 points |
In 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 141 and 213 hp or 104 and 157 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1988 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 V6 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+44% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 17 kw | 45.5 points |
3.4 V6 |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
+27% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 62.6 points |
2.3 16V |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.1 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
In 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 141 and 213 hp or 104 and 157 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1988 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 V6 |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+44% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 17 kw | 45.5 points |
3.4 V6 |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
+27% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 62.6 points |
2.3 16 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.1 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 16 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
In 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 106 and 162 hp or 78 and 119 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1984 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 16V |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
2.5 i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+42% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 42.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 49.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.1 points |
In 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 106 and 162 hp or 78 and 119 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1984 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 16V |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 70.4 points |
2.5 i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+42% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 42.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 49.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.1 points |
In 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 106 and 162 hp or 78 and 119 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1982 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+42% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 42.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 49.1 points |
2.2 i |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+31% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 55.5 points |
3.1 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 52.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 i |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.1 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.3 points |
In 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 106 and 162 hp or 78 and 119 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - | |
3.3 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
- | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 49.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.1 points |
In 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower was between 106 and 162 hp or 78 and 119 kW.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to weight ratio in 1982 is shown in the chart.
Oldsmobile Cutlass horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+42% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 42.4 points |
3.3 V6 |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+35% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 49.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 42.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.1 points |