In 2017 Nissan X-Trail horsepower was between 130 and 177 hp or 96 and 130 kW.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 dCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+56% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 88.2 points |
1.6 DiG-T |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 101.9 points |
2.0 dCi |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+53% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 88.5 points |
1.6 dCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 81.3 points |
1.3 DIG-T |
159 hp / 117 kw
(-8%) |
+41% | 32 hp / 23 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 122.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.7 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 DiG-T |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 DIG-T |
Power (difference from average) |
159 hp / 117 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 122.3 points |
In 2014 Nissan X-Trail horsepower was between 130 and 177 hp or 96 and 130 kW.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 dCi |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+59% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 81.3 points |
1.6 DIG-T |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 101.9 points |
2.0 dCi |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+53% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 88.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 DIG-T |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.5 points |
In 2010 Nissan X-Trail horsepower was 173 hp or 127 kW
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
+52% | 35 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.5 points |
In 2007 Nissan X-Trail horsepower was 173 hp or 127 kW
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
+46% | 35 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.5 points |
In 2003 Nissan X-Trail horsepower was between 136 and 165 hp or 100 and 121 kW.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i 16V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+28% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 66 points |
2.0 |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.2 dCi |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+57% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 61.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.5i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.8 points |
In 2001 Nissan X-Trail horsepower was 140 hp or 103 kW
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Nissan X-Trail horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+27% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |