In 1999 Nissan Silvia horsepower was between 165 and 250 hp or 121 and 184 kW.
Nissan Silvia horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Silvia horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V T |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+9% | 125 hp / 92 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
2.0 i 16V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+14% | 83 hp / 61 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 82.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V T |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 9 % |
Power per passenger | 125 hp / 92 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 83 hp / 61 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.5 points |
In 1993 Nissan Silvia horsepower was 200 hp or 147 kW
Nissan Silvia horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+25% | 100 hp / 74 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 100 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 100 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
In 1990 Nissan Silvia horsepower was between 135 and 205 hp or 99 and 151 kW.
Nissan Silvia horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Silvia horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8T |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+23% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 97.2 points |
2.0T |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+25% | 51 hp / 38 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 102.5 points |
2.0i |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+22% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
1.8i |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+15% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.8T |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 97.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0T |
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 15 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |