2009 Frontier II Crew Cab Long (D40, facelift 2009)
2009 Frontier II Crew Cab (D40, facelift 2009)
2009 Frontier II King Cab (D40, facelift 2009)
2005 Frontier II Crew Cab (D40)
2005 Frontier II Crew Cab Long (D40)
2005 Frontier II King Cab (D40)
2000 Frontier I Crew Cab Long (D22, facelift 2000)
2000 Frontier I King Cab (D22, facelift 2000)
2000 Frontier I King Cab Long (D22, facelift 2000)
2000 Frontier I Regular Cab (D22, facelift 2000)
1998 Frontier I King Cab (D22)
1998 Frontier I Regular Cab (D22)
In 2009 Nissan Frontier horsepower was 261 hp or 192 kW
Nissan Frontier horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
+31% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 65.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.3 points |
In 2009 Nissan Frontier horsepower was 261 hp or 192 kW
Nissan Frontier horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
+31% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 65.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.3 points |
In 2009 Nissan Frontier horsepower was between 152 and 261 hp or 112 and 192 kW.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
+34% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 60.8 points |
4.0 V6 |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
+31% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 65.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
152 hp / 112 kw
(-12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.8 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.3 points |
In 2005 Nissan Frontier horsepower was 265 hp or 195 kW
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+31% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
In 2005 Nissan Frontier horsepower was 261 hp or 192 kW
Nissan Frontier horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
+31% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 65.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
261 hp / 192 kw
(+51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.3 points |
In 2005 Nissan Frontier horsepower was between 154 and 265 hp or 113 and 195 kW.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
+33% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 28 kw | 61.6 points |
4.0 V6 |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+31% | 66 hp / 49 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 66.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.6 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 66 hp / 49 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.3 points |
In 2000 Nissan Frontier horsepower was between 180 and 210 hp or 132 and 154 kW.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desert Runner 3.3 V6 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+33% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 63.6 points |
3.3 |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+34% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 54.5 points |
Vehicle | Desert Runner 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.5 points |
In 2000 Nissan Frontier horsepower was between 143 and 210 hp or 105 and 154 kW.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.6 points |
3.3 V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 51.5 points |
Desert Runner 3.3 V6 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+33% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 63.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.5 points |
Vehicle | Desert Runner 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.6 points |
In 2000 Nissan Frontier horsepower was between 143 and 210 hp or 105 and 154 kW.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 51.5 points |
2.4 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
- | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.6 points |
Desert Runner 3.3 V6 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+33% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 63.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.6 points |
Vehicle | Desert Runner 3.3 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.6 points |
In 2000 Nissan Frontier horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 72 hp / 53 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 72 hp / 53 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.6 points |
In 1998 Nissan Frontier horsepower was between 143 and 170 hp or 105 and 125 kW.
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+37% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 51.5 points |
2.4 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.6 points |
In 1998 Nissan Frontier horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Nissan Frontier horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+32% | 72 hp / 53 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 72 hp / 53 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.6 points |