In 2006 Nissan Bluebird horsepower was between 109 and 133 hp or 80 and 98 kW.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5i |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+26% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 72.7 points |
2.0i |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+30% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.5 points |
In 2000 Nissan Bluebird horsepower was between 109 and 145 hp or 80 and 107 kW.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+33% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 68.8 points |
1.5i |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+24% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 72.7 points |
1.8i |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 65 points |
2.0i |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+19% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
In 1996 Nissan Bluebird horsepower was between 76 and 190 hp or 56 and 140 kW.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to weight ratio in 1996 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d |
76 hp / 56 kw
(-56%) |
+42% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 38 points |
1.8 Eprise |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+22% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
1.8 FE |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+20% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0i |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+19% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
1.8 XE Attesa |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+20% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0 SSS-Z |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+3% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 95 points |
1.8 Le grand |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+25% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 72.2 points |
2.0 SSS |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+19% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 SSS Limited |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+19% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
76 hp / 56 kw
(-56%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 38 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Eprise |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 FE |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 XE Attesa |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS-Z |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 3 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Le grand |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS Limited |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 1991 Nissan Bluebird horsepower was between 67 and 211 hp or 49 and 155 kW.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0T |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
+23% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 105.5 points |
2.0D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
+48% | 13 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 12 kw | 33.5 points |
1.8i |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+20% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0i |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+19% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.4 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+29% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0T |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 105.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0D |
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 48 % |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 33.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 1987 Nissan Bluebird horsepower was between 67 and 140 hp or 49 and 103 kW.
Nissan Bluebird horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
- | 13 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 12 kw | 33.5 points |
2.0 SSS |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+23% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
1.8i |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
+38% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 48.9 points |
1.8 SSS |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+16% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 77.8 points |
1.6 |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
+36% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 49.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 33.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 SSS |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.4 points |