In 1998 Nissan Avenir horsepower was between 91 and 220 hp or 67 and 162 kW.
Nissan Avenir horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Avenir horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+19% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
GT4 2.0i 16V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+20% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 55 hp / 41 kw | 110 points |
1.8i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+22% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0d 16V |
91 hp / 67 kw
(-47%) |
+49% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | GT4 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 55 hp / 41 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 110 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0d 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
91 hp / 67 kw
(-47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45.5 points |
In 1991 Nissan Avenir horsepower was between 91 and 210 hp or 67 and 154 kW.
Nissan Avenir horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Nissan Avenir horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+24% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 105 points |
1.8i 16V |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+27% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 61.1 points |
Type B 1.8i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+20% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
2.0d |
91 hp / 67 kw
(-47%) |
+51% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45.5 points |
Type F 2.0i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+19% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 105 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.1 points |
Vehicle | Type B 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Power (difference from average) |
91 hp / 67 kw
(-47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45.5 points |
Vehicle | Type F 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |