In 2006 Nissan AD horsepower was between 90 and 124 hp or 66 and 91 kW.
Nissan AD horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Nissan AD horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+27% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 68.1 points |
1.2 i |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+26% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 75 points |
1.5i |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+26% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 72.7 points |
1.8 i |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
+28% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 68.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.2 i |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Power (difference from average) |
124 hp / 91 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.9 points |
In 1999 Nissan AD horsepower was between 79 and 120 hp or 58 and 88 kW.
Nissan AD horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Nissan AD horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3i |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
+23% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 66.9 points |
2.2d |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
+50% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 35.9 points |
1.5i |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
+25% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 70.7 points |
1.8i |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+26% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.8 i |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+30% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 58.3 points |
1.3 i |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+25% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 69.2 points |
1.5 i |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+24% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 66.7 points |
2.2 d |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
+50% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 35.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.3i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
87 hp / 64 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.2d |
Power (difference from average) |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 i |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 d |
Power (difference from average) |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 35.9 points |
In 1990 Nissan AD horsepower was between 55 and 105 hp or 40 and 77 kW.
Nissan AD horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Nissan AD horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d |
76 hp / 56 kw
(-56%) |
+42% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 38 points |
1.5 i |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+22% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 70 points |
1.5i |
94 hp / 69 kw
(-46%) |
+25% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 17 kw | 62.7 points |
1.7 d |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
+47% | 11 hp / 8 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 32.4 points |
1.3i |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
+23% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 60.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
76 hp / 56 kw
(-56%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 38 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 i |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Power (difference from average) |
94 hp / 69 kw
(-46%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.7 d |
Power (difference from average) |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 11 hp / 8 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 32.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.3i |
Power (difference from average) |
79 hp / 58 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.8 points |