In 1998 Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower was between 150 and 150 hp or 110 and 110 kW.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDI 4x4 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+33% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 62.5 points |
2.4 GDI |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+33% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI 4x4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 1998 Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower was between 133 and 215 hp or 98 and 158 kW.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDi 16V |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+30% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 61.3 points |
3.0 GDi 24V 4X4 |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+28% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 71.7 points |
3.0 GDi 24V |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
+28% | 43 hp / 32 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 71.7 points |
2.4 GDi 16V 4X4 |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+30% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 61.3 points |
2.4 GDi |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+28% | 24 hp / 17 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 68.8 points |
2.0 i 16V |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+24% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDi 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 GDi 24V 4X4 |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 GDi 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
215 hp / 158 kw
(+24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDi 16V 4X4 |
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDi |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.5 points |
In 1991 Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower was between 75 and 133 hp or 55 and 98 kW.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 TD GLX |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+52% | 12 hp / 9 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 41 points |
2.0 GLXi |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+24% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.5 points |
2.0 GLXi 4x4 |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+24% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.5 points |
1.8 TD |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 4x4 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD GLX |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 12 hp / 9 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLXi |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLXi 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1983 Mitsubishi Space Wagon horsepower was between 75 and 102 hp or 55 and 75 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GLXi 4x4 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 GLXi |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 GLX 4x4 |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 GLX |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 4x4 |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 TD |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 GLX |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 4x4 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLXi 4x4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLXi |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLX 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLX |
Power (difference from average) |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 GLX |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |