In 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner horsepower was between 136 and 150 hp or 100 and 110 kW.
Mitsubishi Space Runner horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Space Runner horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.4 GDI |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+33% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 1991 Mitsubishi Space Runner horsepower was between 82 and 133 hp or 60 and 98 kW.
Mitsubishi Space Runner horsepower to weight ratio in 1991 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Space Runner horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+24% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 67.8 points |
2.0 TD GLX |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+52% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 41 points |
1.8 4x4 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+24% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 67.8 points |
2.0 16V |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
+24% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD GLX |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
133 hp / 98 kw
(-23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.5 points |