In 2018 Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower was between 135 and 150 hp or 99 and 110 kW.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MIVEC |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+23% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.4 PHEV |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+36% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 PHEV |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
In 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower was between 150 and 224 hp or 110 and 165 kW.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MIVEC |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+23% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
GT 3.0 MIVEC V6 |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 74.7 points |
2.4 MIVEC |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+25% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 69.6 points |
2.2 DI-D |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+61% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 65.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | GT 3.0 MIVEC V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 DI-D |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.2 points |
In 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower was between 150 and 224 hp or 110 and 165 kW.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to weight ratio in 2012 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MIVEC |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+23% | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
2.2 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+61% | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
2.4 MIVEC |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 17 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 69.2 points |
3.0 MIVEC V6 |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+23% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 74.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
Power (difference from average) |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 MIVEC V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74.7 points |
In 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower was between 140 and 220 hp or 103 and 162 kW.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 DI-D |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+55% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
3.0 i V6 24V XL |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+22% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 73.3 points |
2.4i |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+27% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 70.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI-D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XL |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.8 points |
In 2001 Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower was between 136 and 202 hp or 100 and 149 kW.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Outlander horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V 4WD |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
+26% | 32 hp / 23 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 65.8 points |
2.4 i 16V 4WD XLS |
142 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+33% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.2 points |
2.4i AWD |
142 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+33% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 59.2 points |
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+33% | 40 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 37 kw | 101 points |
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+23% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
158 hp / 116 kw
(-9%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD XLS |
Power (difference from average) |
142 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4i AWD |
Power (difference from average) |
142 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |