In 1998 Mitsubishi Minica horsepower was between 50 and 50 hp or 37 and 37 kW.
Mitsubishi Minica horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Minica horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.7 i 12V 4WD |
50 hp / 37 kw
(-71%) |
+19% | 10 hp / 7 kw | 17 hp / 12 kw | 71.4 points |
0.7 i 12V |
50 hp / 37 kw
(-71%) |
+19% | 10 hp / 7 kw | 17 hp / 12 kw | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 0.7 i 12V 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
50 hp / 37 kw
(-71%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 10 hp / 7 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 0.7 i 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
50 hp / 37 kw
(-71%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 10 hp / 7 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
In 1993 Mitsubishi Minica horsepower was between 40 and 64 hp or 29 and 47 kW.
Mitsubishi Minica horsepower to weight ratio in 1993 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Minica horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.66 i 16V ST-4WD |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
+8% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 14 hp / 10 kw | 78.6 points |
0.66 CE |
40 hp / 29 kw
(-77%) |
+22% | 10 hp / 7 kw | 13 hp / 10 kw | 57.1 points |
0.66 16V PG |
50 hp / 37 kw
(-71%) |
+11% | 13 hp / 9 kw | 13 hp / 9 kw | 71.4 points |
0.66 i 20V SR-Z |
64 hp / 47 kw
(-63%) |
+34% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 16 hp / 12 kw | 91.4 points |
Vehicle | 0.66 i 16V ST-4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
Power to torque ratio | 8 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78.6 points |
Vehicle | 0.66 CE |
Power (difference from average) |
40 hp / 29 kw
(-77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 10 hp / 7 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.1 points |
Vehicle | 0.66 16V PG |
Power (difference from average) |
50 hp / 37 kw
(-71%) |
Power to torque ratio | 11 % |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 9 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 13 hp / 9 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | 0.66 i 20V SR-Z |
Power (difference from average) |
64 hp / 47 kw
(-63%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91.4 points |