In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 117 and 168 hp or 86 and 124 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
148 hp / 109 kw
(-14%) |
+25% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 74 points |
2.4 |
168 hp / 124 kw
(-3%) |
+26% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 70 points |
1.6 MIVEC |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
+24% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 73.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
148 hp / 109 kw
(-14%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
168 hp / 124 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 MIVEC |
Power (difference from average) |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.1 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 117 and 140 hp or 86 and 103 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+20% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 77.8 points |
1.6 |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
+24% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 73.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.8 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.1 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 109 and 295 hp or 80 and 217 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 MIVEC |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
+24% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 73.1 points |
1.5i |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+24% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 72.7 points |
1.8i |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+20% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | - |
2.0 DI-D |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+55% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
Ralliart 2.0 |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+22% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 120 points |
2.0i |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+24% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
Evolution 2.0 |
295 hp / 217 kw
(+71%) |
+19% | 59 hp / 43 kw | 74 hp / 54 kw | 147.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
117 hp / 86 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI-D |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | Ralliart 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
295 hp / 217 kw
(+71%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 59 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 74 hp / 54 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 147.5 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 109 and 240 hp or 80 and 177 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 MPI |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+20% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | - |
1.5 |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+25% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 72.7 points |
Ralliart 2.0 |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+22% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 120 points |
2.0 DI-D |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+55% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 MPI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.7 points |
Vehicle | Ralliart 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI-D |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 82 and 280 hp or 60 and 206 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+35% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 61.3 points |
1.3i 16V |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
+32% | 16 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 15 kw | 63.1 points |
Sport 2.0i 16V |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+23% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 67.5 points |
Evolution 2.0 |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
+30% | 70 hp / 52 kw | 70 hp / 52 kw | 140 points |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.3i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
82 hp / 60 kw
(-53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.1 points |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 140 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 98 and 135 hp or 72 and 99 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+35% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 61.3 points |
Sport 1.6i 16V |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
+35% | 20 hp / 14 kw | 25 hp / 18 kw | 61.3 points |
Sport 2.0i 16V |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
+23% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | Sport 1.6i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
98 hp / 72 kw
(-43%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
135 hp / 99 kw
(-22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 265 and 280 hp or 195 and 206 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evolution 2.0 T |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
+27% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 70 hp / 52 kw | 140 points |
Evolution 2.0i 16V |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+25% | 53 hp / 39 kw | 66 hp / 49 kw | 132.5 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 T |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 140 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 66 hp / 49 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 132.5 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was 280 hp or 206 kW
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evolution 2.0 T |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
+27% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 70 hp / 52 kw | 140 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 T |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 140 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 105 and 125 hp or 77 and 92 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5i |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+25% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 70 points | |
1.8i 16V |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
+28% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 69.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.4 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 75 and 280 hp or 55 and 206 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 12V GL,GLX |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+31% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 57.7 points |
Evolution 2.0 T |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
+27% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 70 hp / 52 kw | 140 points |
1.5 |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+20% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 73.3 points |
1.8 GSR |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+25% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 113.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 12V GL,GLX |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 T |
Power (difference from average) |
280 hp / 206 kw
(+62%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 70 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 140 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 GSR |
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 113.9 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 68 and 270 hp or 50 and 199 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
- | - | - | |
1.5 CB3A |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+15% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 76.7 points |
Evolution 2.0 |
270 hp / 199 kw
(+56%) |
- | 54 hp / 40 kw | 68 hp / 50 kw | 135 points |
1.3 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+31% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 57.7 points |
1.6 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 Diesel |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
+45% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 34 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 CB3A |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 15 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76.7 points |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
270 hp / 199 kw
(+56%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 135 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 45 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 68 and 113 hp or 50 and 83 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+18% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 70.6 points |
2.0 D |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
+45% | 14 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 13 kw | 34 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 45 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 34 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 60 and 160 hp or 44 and 118 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 12V |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+26% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 57.7 points |
1.5 12V |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+29% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 60 points |
1.6 |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+28% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 100 points |
1.8 Diesel |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 |
97 hp / 71 kw
(-44%) |
+31% | 19 hp / 14 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 53.9 points |
GTi 1.8 16V |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+16% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 75.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
97 hp / 71 kw
(-44%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.9 points |
Vehicle | GTi 1.8 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.6 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 60 and 136 hp or 44 and 100 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 12V |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+26% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 57.7 points |
1.6 16V |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
+18% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 70.6 points |
1.3 |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
- | - | - | |
1.5 |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
+32% | 17 hp / 12 kw | 21 hp / 16 kw | 56 points |
1.5 12V |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+29% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 60 points |
1.8 Diesel |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
+47% | 12 hp / 9 kw | 15 hp / 11 kw | 33.3 points |
1.8 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+16% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 75.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
113 hp / 83 kw
(-35%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.6 points |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
70 hp / 51 kw
(-60%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | 47 % |
Power per passenger | 12 hp / 9 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 33.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.6 points |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 55 and 75 hp or 40 and 55 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
- | - | - | |
1.5 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 Diesel |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 58 and 90 hp or 43 and 66 kW.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to weight ratio in Lancer is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+26% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 50 points |
1.8 |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
- | - | - | |
1.5 12V |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+29% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 60 points |
1.8 D |
58 hp / 43 kw
(-66%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
83 hp / 61 kw
(-52%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Power (difference from average) |
58 hp / 43 kw
(-66%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 55 and 105 hp or 40 and 77 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
- | - | - | |
1.4 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
55 hp / 40 kw
(-68%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer horsepower was between 54 and 170 hp or 40 and 125 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
54 hp / 40 kw
(-69%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
- | - | - | |
1.4 |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 Turbo |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
54 hp / 40 kw
(-69%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
84 hp / 62 kw
(-51%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
68 hp / 50 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |