In 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 181 hp or 133 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+58% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 75.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.4 points |
In 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 181 hp or 133 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+58% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 75.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.4 points |
In 2019 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 181 hp or 133 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
+58% | 91 hp / 67 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 75.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
181 hp / 133 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 91 hp / 67 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.4 points |
In 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 154 hp or 113 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
+59% | 39 hp / 28 kw | 39 hp / 28 kw | 64.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.2 points |
In 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 154 hp or 113 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
+59% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 39 hp / 28 kw | 64.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.2 points |
In 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 154 hp or 113 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
+59% | 77 hp / 57 kw | 39 hp / 28 kw | 64.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
154 hp / 113 kw
(-11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.2 points |
In 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was between 136 and 178 hp or 100 and 131 kW.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 DI-D |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+57% | 27 hp / 20 kw | - | 54.4 points |
2.5 HP DI-D |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
+49% | 36 hp / 26 kw | - | 71.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 DI-D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 54.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 HP DI-D |
Power (difference from average) |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 49 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | 71.2 points |
In 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was 136 hp or 100 kW
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+57% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 54.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.4 points |
In 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower was between 90 and 132 hp or 66 and 97 kW.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to weight ratio in 1996 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi L 200 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD 4X4 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+63% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 36 points |
2.4 4x4 |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
+31% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 55 points |
2.5 TD 4x4 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+58% | 25 hp / 19 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 40 points |
2.0 i 2WD |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
+38% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 47.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD 4X4 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 63 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 36 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 40 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 2WD |
Power (difference from average) |
95 hp / 70 kw
(-45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.5 points |