In 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 160 and 265 hp or 118 and 195 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS 2.4L |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+25% | 40 hp / 30 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 66.7 points |
3.8L V6 MIVEC |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+25% | 66 hp / 49 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 69.7 points |
Vehicle | GS 2.4L |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 66 hp / 49 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.7 points |
In 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 162 and 265 hp or 119 and 195 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 2009 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+25% | 66 hp / 49 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 69.7 points |
2.4L |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+26% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 66 hp / 49 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4L |
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
In 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 162 and 265 hp or 119 and 195 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4L MIVEC |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+25% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 67.5 points |
GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+19% | 66 hp / 49 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 69.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4L MIVEC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 66 hp / 49 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.7 points |
In 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 162 and 263 hp or 119 and 193 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4L |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
+25% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 67.5 points |
GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
+25% | 66 hp / 48 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 69.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4L |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
162 hp / 119 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 67.5 points |
Vehicle | GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
Power (difference from average) |
263 hp / 193 kw
(+52%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 66 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.2 points |
In 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was 210 hp or 154 kW
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 2003 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTS 3.0 i V6 24V |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+24% | 105 hp / 77 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
Vehicle | GTS 3.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 105 hp / 77 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
In 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 147 and 200 hp or 108 and 147 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+31% | 74 hp / 54 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 61.3 points |
GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+28% | 100 hp / 74 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 74 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 100 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
In 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 147 and 200 hp or 108 and 147 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 2000 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS 2.4 i 16V |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+31% | 74 hp / 54 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 61.3 points |
GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+28% | 100 hp / 74 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | GS 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 74 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 100 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
In 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 141 and 213 hp or 104 and 157 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Turbo 16V |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
+27% | 107 hp / 79 kw | 53 hp / 39 kw | 106.5 points |
2.0i 16V |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
+20% | 71 hp / 52 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
213 hp / 157 kw
(+23%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 107 hp / 79 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 53 hp / 39 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 106.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
141 hp / 104 kw
(-18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
In 1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower was between 93 and 195 hp or 68 and 143 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
93 hp / 68 kw
(-46%) |
+35% | 47 hp / 34 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 51.7 points |
2.0 i 16V |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+14% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
+29% | 98 hp / 72 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 97.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
93 hp / 68 kw
(-46%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 98 hp / 72 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 97.5 points |