In 1995 Mitsubishi Diamante horsepower was between 200 and 240 hp or 147 and 177 kW.
Mitsubishi Diamante horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Diamante horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 24V GDI 4WD |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+21% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 80 points |
3.5 i V6 24V |
208 hp / 153 kw
(+20%) |
+31% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 59.4 points |
2.5 i V6 24V GDI |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+20% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 80 points |
3.0 i V6 24V GDI |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+21% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 80 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GDI 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
208 hp / 153 kw
(+20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V GDI |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GDI |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 80 points |
In 1990 Mitsubishi Diamante horsepower was between 145 and 210 hp or 107 and 154 kW.
Mitsubishi Diamante horsepower to weight ratio in 1990 is shown in the chart.
Mitsubishi Diamante horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i V6 24V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+20% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 72.5 points |
2.5 i V6 24V 4WD |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+21% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 29 hp / 22 kw | 70 points |
3.0 i V6 24V 4WD |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+22% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+22% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 21 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |