In 2001 MG ZT horsepower was between 116 and 260 hp or 85 and 191 kW.
MG ZT horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
MG ZT horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+55% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 58 points |
2.5 i V6 24V |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+30% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 64 points |
4.6 i V8 32V |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
+37% | 65 hp / 48 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 56.5 points |
1.8 i 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.8 i 16V Turbo |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+26% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 88.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V |
Power (difference from average) |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.9 points |
In 2001 MG ZT horsepower was between 116 and 260 hp or 85 and 191 kW.
MG ZT horsepower to weight ratio in 2001 is shown in the chart.
MG ZT horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+55% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 58 points |
1.8 i 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+25% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 66.7 points |
1.8 i 16V Turbo |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+26% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 88.9 points |
2.5 i V6 24V |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+22% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 76 points |
4.6 i V8 32V |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
+37% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 56.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V |
Power (difference from average) |
260 hp / 191 kw
(+50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.5 points |