In 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower was between 204 and 523 hp or 150 and 385 kW.
Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower to weight ratio in 2012 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML 400 |
333 hp / 245 kw
(+92%) |
+31% | 67 hp / 49 kw | 56 hp / 41 kw | 111 points |
ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
+59% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 97.1 points |
ML 350 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+17% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 87.4 points |
AMG ML 63 |
523 hp / 385 kw
(+202%) |
+25% | 105 hp / 77 kw | 65 hp / 48 kw | 95.1 points |
ML 500 |
408 hp / 300 kw
(+136%) |
+32% | 82 hp / 60 kw | 51 hp / 38 kw | 86.8 points |
Vehicle | ML 400 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
333 hp / 245 kw
(+92%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 67 hp / 49 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 111 points |
Vehicle | ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 97.1 points |
Vehicle | ML 350 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 87.4 points |
Vehicle | AMG ML 63 |
Power (difference from average) |
523 hp / 385 kw
(+202%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 105 hp / 77 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 65 hp / 48 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 95.1 points |
Vehicle | ML 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
408 hp / 300 kw
(+136%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 82 hp / 60 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 51 hp / 38 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86.8 points |
In 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower was between 190 and 510 hp or 140 and 375 kW.
Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML 280 CDI |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+57% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 63.3 points |
AMG ML 63 |
510 hp / 375 kw
(+195%) |
+19% | 73 hp / 54 kw | 64 hp / 47 kw | 82.3 points |
ML 550 |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
+27% | 78 hp / 57 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 77.6 points |
ML 500 4Matic |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
+27% | 78 hp / 57 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 77.6 points |
ML 350 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+22% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 77.7 points |
ML 500 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+25% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 61.2 points |
ML 320 CDI |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+56% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 74.7 points |
ML 350 BlueTEC |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
+61% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70.3 points |
ML 420 CDI |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+56% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 76.5 points |
Vehicle | ML 280 CDI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.3 points |
Vehicle | AMG ML 63 |
Power (difference from average) |
510 hp / 375 kw
(+195%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 73 hp / 54 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.3 points |
Vehicle | ML 550 |
Power (difference from average) |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.6 points |
Vehicle | ML 500 4Matic |
Power (difference from average) |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.6 points |
Vehicle | ML 350 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.7 points |
Vehicle | ML 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.2 points |
Vehicle | ML 320 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74.7 points |
Vehicle | ML 350 BlueTEC |
Power (difference from average) |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
Power to torque ratio | 61 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.3 points |
Vehicle | ML 420 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 76.5 points |
In 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower was between 150 and 347 hp or 110 and 255 kW.
Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz ML horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML 270 CDI |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+56% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 60.4 points |
AMG ML 55 |
347 hp / 255 kw
(+101%) |
+32% | 69 hp / 51 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 64.3 points |
ML 320 V6 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
ML 500 |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
+34% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 58.4 points |
ML 430 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+30% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 63.3 points |
ML 350 |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
+32% | 47 hp / 35 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 63.5 points |
ML 400 CDI |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+55% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 62.5 points |
ML 230 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+32% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 65.2 points |
Vehicle | ML 270 CDI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.4 points |
Vehicle | AMG ML 55 |
Power (difference from average) |
347 hp / 255 kw
(+101%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 69 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.3 points |
Vehicle | ML 320 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | ML 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.4 points |
Vehicle | ML 430 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.3 points |
Vehicle | ML 350 |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.5 points |
Vehicle | ML 400 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | ML 230 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.2 points |