In 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 183 and 388 hp or 135 and 285 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 |
183 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
+27% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 101.7 points |
CLK 280 |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
+23% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 39 hp / 28 kw | 77 points |
CLK 350 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+22% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 90.7 points |
CLK 500 |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
+27% | 97 hp / 71 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 70.5 points |
CLK 320 CDI |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+56% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 74.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
183 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 101.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 280 |
Power (difference from average) |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
Vehicle | CLK 350 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 97 hp / 71 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74.7 points |
In 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 150 and 481 hp or 110 and 354 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMG CLK 63 |
481 hp / 354 kw
(+178%) |
+24% | 120 hp / 89 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 77.6 points |
CLK 350 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+22% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 77.7 points |
CLK 200 |
184 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
+26% | 46 hp / 34 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 102.2 points |
CLK 280 |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
+23% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 39 hp / 28 kw | 77 points |
CLK 220 CDI |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+56% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 71.4 points |
CLK 320 CDI |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+56% | 56 hp / 41 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 74.7 points |
CLK 500 |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
+27% | 97 hp / 71 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 70.5 points |
Vehicle | AMG CLK 63 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
481 hp / 354 kw
(+178%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 120 hp / 89 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.6 points |
Vehicle | CLK 350 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
184 hp / 135 kw
(+6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102.2 points |
Vehicle | CLK 280 |
Power (difference from average) |
231 hp / 170 kw
(+34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
Vehicle | CLK 220 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.4 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 56 hp / 41 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 74.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
388 hp / 285 kw
(+124%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 97 hp / 71 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70.5 points |
In 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 163 and 306 hp or 120 and 225 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 2002 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 200 CGI |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+32% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 94.4 points |
CLK 500 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+33% | 77 hp / 56 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 61.2 points |
CLK 240 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+29% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 65.4 points |
CLK 200 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+32% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 90.6 points |
CLK 320 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 CGI |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 94.4 points |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.2 points |
Vehicle | CLK 240 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.4 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.6 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
In 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 163 and 367 hp or 120 and 270 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 2002 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 240 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+29% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 65.4 points |
CLK 200 CGI |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+32% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 94.4 points |
CLK 500 |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+33% | 77 hp / 56 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 61.2 points |
CLK 270 CDI |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+58% | 43 hp / 31 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 63 points |
CLK 200 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+32% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 90.6 points |
CLK 320 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
AMG CLK 55 |
367 hp / 270 kw
(+112%) |
+28% | 92 hp / 68 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 68 points |
Vehicle | CLK 240 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65.4 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 CGI |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 94.4 points |
Vehicle | CLK 500 |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 77 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.2 points |
Vehicle | CLK 270 CDI |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.6 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | AMG CLK 55 |
Power (difference from average) |
367 hp / 270 kw
(+112%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 92 hp / 68 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
In 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 163 and 279 hp or 120 and 205 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 230 |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
+30% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 85.7 points |
CLK 200 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+29% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 81.5 points |
CLK 320 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
CLK 430 |
279 hp / 205 kw
(+61%) |
+30% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 64.9 points |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | CLK 430 |
Power (difference from average) |
279 hp / 205 kw
(+61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.9 points |
In 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 163 and 279 hp or 120 and 205 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 1999 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 320 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
CLK 200 |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+29% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 81.5 points |
CLK 230 |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
+30% | 49 hp / 36 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 85.7 points |
CLK 430 |
279 hp / 205 kw
(+61%) |
+30% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 64.9 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 81.5 points |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Power (difference from average) |
197 hp / 145 kw
(+14%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85.7 points |
Vehicle | CLK 430 |
Power (difference from average) |
279 hp / 205 kw
(+61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.9 points |
In 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 192 and 218 hp or 141 and 160 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 320 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
CLK 200 |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
+29% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 96 points |
CLK 230 |
193 hp / 142 kw
(+12%) |
+31% | 48 hp / 36 kw | 48 hp / 36 kw | 83.9 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 96 points |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Power (difference from average) |
193 hp / 142 kw
(+12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.9 points |
In 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower was between 192 and 279 hp or 141 and 205 kW.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to weight ratio in 1997 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz CLK horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLK 320 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+30% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 68.1 points |
CLK 430 |
279 hp / 205 kw
(+61%) |
+30% | 70 hp / 51 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 64.9 points |
CLK 230 |
193 hp / 142 kw
(+12%) |
+31% | 48 hp / 36 kw | 48 hp / 36 kw | 83.9 points |
CLK 200 |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
+29% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | 96 points |
Vehicle | CLK 320 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68.1 points |
Vehicle | CLK 430 |
Power (difference from average) |
279 hp / 205 kw
(+61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 70 hp / 51 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.9 points |
Vehicle | CLK 230 |
Power (difference from average) |
193 hp / 142 kw
(+12%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 83.9 points |
Vehicle | CLK 200 |
Power (difference from average) |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 96 points |