In 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190 horsepower was between 72 and 235 hp or 53 and 173 kW.
Mercedes-Benz 190 horsepower to weight ratio in 1982 is shown in the chart.
Mercedes-Benz 190 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 2.0 |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
- | - | - | |
2.5 D |
91 hp / 67 kw
(-47%) |
+42% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 18 hp / 13 kw | 36.4 points |
2.0 D |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+40% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 37.5 points |
2.5 TD |
126 hp / 93 kw
(-27%) |
+45% | 25 hp / 19 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.4 points |
Turbo-D 2.5 |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
- | - | - | |
E 2.5-16 |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
- | - | - | |
E Evolution II 2.5 |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
- | - | - | |
E 2.6 |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
- | 33 hp / 24 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | - |
E 2.3-16 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
- | - | - | |
E 2.3 |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8i |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
+26% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 60.6 points |
D 2.0 |
72 hp / 53 kw
(-58%) |
- | - | - | |
2.6 i |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
+27% | 32 hp / 24 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 61.5 points |
2.5 i 16V |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
+17% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 78 points |
2.3 i |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+32% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 59.1 points |
2.0 i |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+30% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 61 points |
2.0 |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | E 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 D |
Power (difference from average) |
91 hp / 67 kw
(-47%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 36.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
126 hp / 93 kw
(-27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 45 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.4 points |
Vehicle | Turbo-D 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | E 2.5-16 |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | E Evolution II 2.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
235 hp / 173 kw
(+36%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | E 2.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | E 2.3-16 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | E 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
132 hp / 97 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 60.6 points |
Vehicle | D 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
72 hp / 53 kw
(-58%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.6 i |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 17 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 78 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 i |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
102 hp / 75 kw
(-41%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |