2018 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2018)
2018 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2018)
2015 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2015)
2015 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2015)
2012 BT-50 Dual Cab II
2012 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II
2008 BT-50 Double Cab I (facelift 2008)
2008 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I (facelift 2008)
2006 BT-50 Double Cab I
2006 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I
In 2018 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was between 200 and 200 hp or 147 and 147 kW.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
XTR 3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2018 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 200 hp or 147 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2015 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was between 200 and 200 hp or 147 and 147 kW.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2015 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 200 hp or 147 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2015 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2012 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was between 200 and 200 hp or 147 and 147 kW.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2012 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2012 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 200 hp or 147 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2012 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+57% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 62.5 points |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 62.5 points |
In 2008 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
In 2008 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
In 2006 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
In 2006 Mazda BT-50 horsepower was 143 hp or 105 kW
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to weight ratio in 2006 is shown in the chart.
Mazda BT-50 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+57% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |