In 1987 Mazda 929 horsepower was between 110 and 200 hp or 81 and 147 kW.
Mazda 929 horsepower to weight ratio in 1987 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 929 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i V6 Turbo |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
+35% | 22 hp / 16 kw | 18 hp / 14 kw | 55 points |
2.0 i V6 |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 72.5 points |
2.2i 12V |
127 hp / 93 kw
(-27%) |
+32% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 57.7 points |
3.0 i V6 |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
+29% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 56.7 points |
3.0 i V6 24V |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+23% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 66.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 Turbo |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
110 hp / 81 kw
(-36%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 18 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.2i 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
127 hp / 93 kw
(-27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
170 hp / 125 kw
(-2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.7 points |
In 1982 Mazda 929 horsepower was between 101 and 120 hp or 74 and 88 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 i GLX |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i GLX |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1982 Mazda 929 horsepower was between 90 and 120 hp or 66 and 88 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 i |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1980 Mazda 929 horsepower was 90 hp or 66 kW
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1979 Mazda 929 horsepower was between 90 and 90 hp or 66 and 66 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Variabel |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Variabel |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |