1998 626 V Station Wagon (GF,GW)
1997 626 V (GF)
1997 626 V Hatchback (GF)
1992 626 IV Hatchback (GE)
1992 626 IV (GE)
1992 626 IV Station Wagon
1988 626 III Station Wagon (GV)
1987 626 III (GD)
1987 626 III Coupe (GD)
1987 626 III Hatchback (GD)
1982 626 II (GC)
1982 626 II Hatchback (GC)
1979 626 I (CB)
In 1998 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 100 and 136 hp or 74 and 100 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1998 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 H.P. |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+25% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 Turbo DI |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+54% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
1.9 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+34% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 55.6 points |
2.0 |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
+33% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 58 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 H.P. |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo DI |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58 points |
In 1997 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 100 and 167 hp or 74 and 123 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1997 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+25% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
1.9 |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+34% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 55.6 points |
2.0 Turbo DI |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+54% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
2.5 V6 |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
+23% | 33 hp / 25 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 66.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo DI |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
167 hp / 123 kw
(-3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.8 points |
In 1997 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 90 and 136 hp or 66 and 100 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1997 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+38% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0 |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+25% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 68 points |
2.0 |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.0 Turbo DI |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+56% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 68 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo DI |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
In 1992 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 75 and 165 hp or 55 and 121 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 4WD |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.0 D GLX Comprex |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+56% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 37.5 points |
2.5 24V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+24% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 28 hp / 20 kw | 66 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D GLX Comprex |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66 points |
In 1992 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 75 and 115 hp or 55 and 85 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+32% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 58.3 points |
2.0 D GLX Comprex |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+56% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 37.5 points |
2.0i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+32% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D GLX Comprex |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
In 1992 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 75 and 115 hp or 55 and 85 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1992 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+56% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 37.5 points |
2.0 i |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+41% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45 points |
2.2i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+36% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 52.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 37.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45 points |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.3 points |
In 1988 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 60 and 140 hp or 44 and 103 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 12V 4WD |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
- | - | - | |
2.2 12V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 D |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 D Comprex |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 12V 4WD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D Comprex |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1987 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 60 and 140 hp or 44 and 103 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 12V |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
- | - | - | |
1.8 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+40% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45 points |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 D |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | - | - | |
2.2 12V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1987 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 90 and 140 hp or 66 and 103 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 12V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 12V |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
+37% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 53.5 points | |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1987 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 60 and 140 hp or 44 and 103 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 12V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 D |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | 15 hp / 11 kw | 30 points |
2.0 16V |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 12V |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
- | 21 hp / 16 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 53.5 points |
1.8 |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 12V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 30 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 12V |
Power (difference from average) |
107 hp / 79 kw
(-38%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
88 hp / 65 kw
(-49%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1982 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 63 and 101 hp or 46 and 74 kW.
Mazda 626 horsepower to weight ratio in 1982 is shown in the chart.
Mazda 626 horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D |
63 hp / 46 kw
(-64%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+35% | 25 hp / 19 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 50.5 points |
1.6 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
63 hp / 46 kw
(-64%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1982 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 63 and 120 hp or 46 and 88 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D |
63 hp / 46 kw
(-64%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
63 hp / 46 kw
(-64%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1979 Mazda 626 horsepower was between 75 and 90 hp or 55 and 66 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |