In 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Velar horsepower was between 180 and 550 hp or 132 and 405 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover Velar horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover Velar horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P 340 3.0 V6 |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
+24% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 57 hp / 42 kw | 113.3 points |
P 250 2.0 |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
+32% | 50 hp / 37 kw | 63 hp / 46 kw | 125 points |
D 300 3.0 V6 |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+57% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 100 points |
SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
550 hp / 405 kw
(+218%) |
+19% | 110 hp / 81 kw | 69 hp / 51 kw | 110 points |
P 380 3.0 V6 |
380 hp / 279 kw
(+120%) |
+16% | 76 hp / 56 kw | 63 hp / 47 kw | 126.7 points |
D 240 2.0 |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+52% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
P 300 2.0 |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
+25% | 60 hp / 44 kw | 75 hp / 55 kw | 150 points |
D 180 2.0 |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+58% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 90 points |
D 275 3.0 V6 |
275 hp / 202 kw
(+59%) |
+56% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 91.7 points |
Vehicle | P 340 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 57 hp / 42 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 113.3 points |
Vehicle | P 250 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
250 hp / 184 kw
(+45%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 125 points |
Vehicle | D 300 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 100 points |
Vehicle | SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
550 hp / 405 kw
(+218%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 110 hp / 81 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 69 hp / 51 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 110 points |
Vehicle | P 380 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
380 hp / 279 kw
(+120%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 76 hp / 56 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 63 hp / 47 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 126.7 points |
Vehicle | D 240 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | P 300 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
300 hp / 221 kw
(+73%) |
Power to torque ratio | 25 % |
Power per passenger | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 150 points |
Vehicle | D 180 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90 points |
Vehicle | D 275 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
275 hp / 202 kw
(+59%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91.7 points |