In 2018 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was 566 hp or 416 kW
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 V8 |
566 hp / 416 kw
(+227%) |
+19% | 142 hp / 104 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 113.2 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
566 hp / 416 kw
(+227%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 142 hp / 104 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 113.2 points |
In 2017 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 258 and 565 hp or 190 and 416 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 SDV8 |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
+54% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 77 points |
3.0 V6 |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
+57% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86 points |
3.0 SDV6 |
275 hp / 202 kw
(+59%) |
+56% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 91.7 points |
5.0 V8 |
565 hp / 416 kw
(+227%) |
+19% | 113 hp / 83 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 113 points |
P400 3.0 |
400 hp / 294 kw
(+131%) |
+27% | 80 hp / 59 kw | 67 hp / 49 kw | 133.3 points |
4.4 V8 |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
+54% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 77 points |
P400e |
404 hp / 297 kw
(+134%) |
+37% | 81 hp / 59 kw | 101 hp / 74 kw | 202 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 SDV8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 SDV6 |
Power (difference from average) |
275 hp / 202 kw
(+59%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91.7 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
565 hp / 416 kw
(+227%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 113 hp / 83 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 113 points |
Vehicle | P400 3.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
400 hp / 294 kw
(+131%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 80 hp / 59 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 67 hp / 49 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 133.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
Vehicle | P400e |
Power (difference from average) |
404 hp / 297 kw
(+134%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 81 hp / 59 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 101 hp / 74 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 202 points |
In 2017 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 258 and 565 hp or 190 and 416 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 2017 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
565 hp / 416 kw
(+227%) |
+19% | 113 hp / 83 kw | 71 hp / 52 kw | 113 points |
P400e |
404 hp / 297 kw
(+134%) |
+37% | 81 hp / 59 kw | 101 hp / 74 kw | 202 points |
4.4 V8 |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
+54% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 77 points |
3.0 V6 |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
+57% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86 points |
5.0 V8 |
525 hp / 386 kw
(+203%) |
+16% | 105 hp / 77 kw | 66 hp / 48 kw | 105 points |
3.0 SDV6 |
275 hp / 202 kw
(+59%) |
+56% | 55 hp / 40 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 91.7 points |
P400 3.0 |
400 hp / 294 kw
(+131%) |
+27% | 80 hp / 59 kw | 67 hp / 49 kw | 133.3 points |
4.4 SDV8 |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
+54% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 77 points |
Vehicle | SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
565 hp / 416 kw
(+227%) |
Power to torque ratio | 19 % |
Power per passenger | 113 hp / 83 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 71 hp / 52 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 113 points |
Vehicle | P400e |
Power (difference from average) |
404 hp / 297 kw
(+134%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 81 hp / 59 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 101 hp / 74 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 202 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
525 hp / 386 kw
(+203%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 105 hp / 77 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 66 hp / 48 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 105 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 SDV6 |
Power (difference from average) |
275 hp / 202 kw
(+59%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 55 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 91.7 points |
Vehicle | P400 3.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
400 hp / 294 kw
(+131%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 80 hp / 59 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 67 hp / 49 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 133.3 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 SDV8 |
Power (difference from average) |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
In 2014 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was 510 hp or 375 kW
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 V8 |
510 hp / 375 kw
(+195%) |
+18% | 102 hp / 75 kw | 64 hp / 47 kw | 102 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
510 hp / 375 kw
(+195%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 102 hp / 75 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102 points |
In 2013 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 258 and 375 hp or 190 and 276 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 2013 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
+44% | 68 hp / 50 kw | 42 hp / 31 kw | 77 points |
3.0 SD V6 |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
+51% | 58 hp / 43 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 97.3 points |
5.0 V8 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+26% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 47 hp / 35 kw | 75 points |
3.0 V6 |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
+57% | 52 hp / 38 kw | 43 hp / 32 kw | 86 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
339 hp / 249 kw
(+96%) |
Power to torque ratio | 44 % |
Power per passenger | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 SD V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
292 hp / 215 kw
(+69%) |
Power to torque ratio | 51 % |
Power per passenger | 58 hp / 43 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 97.3 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
258 hp / 190 kw
(+49%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 52 hp / 38 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 86 points |
In 2009 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 271 and 510 hp or 199 and 375 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 LR V8 |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
+26% | 75 hp / 55 kw | 47 hp / 35 kw | 75 points |
4.4 LR TD V8 |
313 hp / 230 kw
(+81%) |
+55% | 63 hp / 46 kw | 39 hp / 29 kw | 71.1 points |
3.6 LR TD V8 |
271 hp / 199 kw
(+57%) |
+57% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 75.3 points |
5.0 LR V8 |
510 hp / 375 kw
(+195%) |
+18% | 102 hp / 75 kw | 64 hp / 47 kw | 102 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 LR V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
375 hp / 276 kw
(+117%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 75 hp / 55 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 47 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 LR TD V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
313 hp / 230 kw
(+81%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 63 hp / 46 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 71.1 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 LR TD V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
271 hp / 199 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.3 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 LR V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
510 hp / 375 kw
(+195%) |
Power to torque ratio | 18 % |
Power per passenger | 102 hp / 75 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 64 hp / 47 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 102 points |
In 2005 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 272 and 390 hp or 200 and 287 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 i V8 32V SC |
390 hp / 287 kw
(+125%) |
+29% | 78 hp / 57 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 92.9 points |
4.4 i V8 32V |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
+30% | 61 hp / 45 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 69.5 points |
3.6 TD 32V |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+58% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 75.6 points |
Vehicle | 4.2 i V8 32V SC |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
390 hp / 287 kw
(+125%) |
Power to torque ratio | 29 % |
Power per passenger | 78 hp / 57 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 92.9 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 i V8 32V |
Power (difference from average) |
306 hp / 225 kw
(+77%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 61 hp / 45 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.5 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 TD 32V |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75.6 points |
In 2002 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 177 and 286 hp or 130 and 210 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 2002 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 |
286 hp / 210 kw
(+65%) |
+35% | 57 hp / 42 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 65 points |
2.9 TD 24V |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+55% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 61 points |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
286 hp / 210 kw
(+65%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 57 hp / 42 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 65 points |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD 24V |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61 points |
In 1995 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 136 and 224 hp or 100 and 165 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 1995 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 HSE |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+41% | 45 hp / 33 kw | 28 hp / 21 kw | 48.7 points |
2.5 D |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
+50% | 27 hp / 20 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 54.4 points |
4.0 |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
+46% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 47.4 points |
3.9 V8 |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
- | 38 hp / 28 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 48.7 points |
4.6 |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
+46% | 44 hp / 32 kw | 27 hp / 20 kw | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 HSE |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 D |
Power (difference from average) |
136 hp / 100 kw
(-21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 50 % |
Power per passenger | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 54.4 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
185 hp / 136 kw
(+7%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 3.9 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.7 points |
Vehicle | 4.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
218 hp / 160 kw
(+26%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 27 hp / 20 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
In 1970 Land Rover Range Rover horsepower was between 106 and 202 hp or 78 and 149 kW.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to weight ratio in 1970 is shown in the chart.
Land Rover Range Rover horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 Vogue LSE |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
+-36% | 40 hp / 30 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 47 points |
3.9 Vogue SEI |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
+42% | 36 hp / 27 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 46.7 points |
3.9 V8 |
188 hp / 138 kw
(+9%) |
+41% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 24 hp / 17 kw | 48.2 points |
2.4 Diesel |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - | |
3.5 |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | - | - | |
3.5 Vogue |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
- | - | - | |
3.9 CAT |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
- | - | - | |
3.9 |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 4.3 Vogue LSE |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
202 hp / 149 kw
(+17%) |
Power to torque ratio | -36 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47 points |
Vehicle | 3.9 Vogue SEI |
Power (difference from average) |
182 hp / 134 kw
(+5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 42 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.7 points |
Vehicle | 3.9 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
188 hp / 138 kw
(+9%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 Diesel |
Power (difference from average) |
106 hp / 78 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
146 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.5 Vogue |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.9 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 3.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
173 hp / 127 kw
(0%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |