In 2008 Lancia Delta horsepower was between 120 and 165 hp or 88 and 121 kW.
Lancia Delta horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Lancia Delta horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4T-Jet 16V |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+27% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 107.1 points |
1.6JTD Multijet 16V |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
+60% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 75 points |
2.0JTD Multijet 16V |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+54% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 82.5 points |
Vehicle | 1.4T-Jet 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 107.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6JTD Multijet 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0JTD Multijet 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 54 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 82.5 points |
In 1993 Lancia Delta horsepower was between 75 and 193 hp or 55 and 142 kW.
Lancia Delta horsepower to weight ratio in 1993 is shown in the chart.
Lancia Delta horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
139 hp / 102 kw
(-20%) |
+23% | 28 hp / 20 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 69.5 points |
2.0 Turbo |
186 hp / 137 kw
(+8%) |
+36% | 37 hp / 27 kw | 47 hp / 34 kw | 93 points |
2.0 HPE |
193 hp / 142 kw
(+12%) |
- | - | - | |
1.9 TD |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+52% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 47.4 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
1.8 i.e. |
103 hp / 76 kw
(-40%) |
+27% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 57.2 points |
1.8 GT |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
+20% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 77.1 points |
1.6 i.e. |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+40% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 46.9 points |
1.6 |
103 hp / 76 kw
(-40%) |
+28% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 64.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
139 hp / 102 kw
(-20%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 20 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 69.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
186 hp / 137 kw
(+8%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 47 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 93 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HPE |
Power (difference from average) |
193 hp / 142 kw
(+12%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 i.e. |
Power (difference from average) |
103 hp / 76 kw
(-40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 27 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | 20 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 77.1 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i.e. |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.9 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
103 hp / 76 kw
(-40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 64.4 points |
In 1979 Lancia Delta horsepower was between 75 and 211 hp or 55 and 155 kW.
Lancia Delta horsepower to weight ratio in 1979 is shown in the chart.
Lancia Delta horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
2.0 HF Integrale 4WD |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 HF Integrale 16V Evo 4WD |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 HF Integrale 16V 4WD |
196 hp / 144 kw
(+13%) |
- | 39 hp / 29 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 98 points |
2.0 HF 4WD |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 HF Turbo |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
- | - | - | |
1.9 Turbo DS |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 HF |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+30% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | - |
1.6 GT i.e. |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
- | - | - | |
1.6 GT |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | - | - | |
1.5 |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 HF Integrale 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 HF Integrale 16V Evo 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
211 hp / 155 kw
(+22%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 HF Integrale 16V 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
196 hp / 144 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 98 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 HF 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
166 hp / 122 kw
(-4%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 HF Turbo |
Power (difference from average) |
131 hp / 96 kw
(-24%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.9 Turbo DS |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 HF |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 GT i.e. |
Power (difference from average) |
109 hp / 80 kw
(-37%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 GT |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Power (difference from average) |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |