In 2018 Jeep Cherokee horsepower was between 180 and 272 hp or 132 and 200 kW.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to weight ratio in 2018 is shown in the chart.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 MultiJet II |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
+57% | 39 hp / 29 kw | 49 hp / 36 kw | 88.6 points |
2.0 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+32% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 68 hp / 50 kw | 136 points |
3.2 V6 |
271 hp / 199 kw
(+57%) |
+16% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 84.7 points |
2.4 |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
+22% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 MultiJet II |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
195 hp / 143 kw
(+13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 39 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 49 hp / 36 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 68 hp / 50 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 136 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
271 hp / 199 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 16 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 84.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Power (difference from average) |
180 hp / 132 kw
(+4%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
In 2014 Jeep Cherokee horsepower was between 140 and 272 hp or 103 and 200 kW.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to weight ratio in 2014 is shown in the chart.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+60% | 28 hp / 21 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.2 MultiJet II TD |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+55% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 90.9 points |
3.2 V6 |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
+14% | 54 hp / 40 kw | 45 hp / 33 kw | 85 points |
2.4 MultiAir2 TIGERSHARK |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+23% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 73.8 points |
2.2 MultiJet TD |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+55% | 40 hp / 29 kw | 50 hp / 37 kw | 90.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 60 % |
Power per passenger | 28 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 MultiJet II TD |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.9 points |
Vehicle | 3.2 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
272 hp / 200 kw
(+57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 14 % |
Power per passenger | 54 hp / 40 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 45 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 85 points |
Vehicle | 2.4 MultiAir2 TIGERSHARK |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 MultiJet TD |
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 55 % |
Power per passenger | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 50 hp / 37 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 90.9 points |
In 2008 Jeep Cherokee horsepower was between 177 and 205 hp or 130 and 151 kW.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to weight ratio in 2008 is shown in the chart.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 V6 |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
+35% | 41 hp / 30 kw | 34 hp / 25 kw | 55.4 points |
2.8 CRD |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
+62% | 35 hp / 26 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 63.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
205 hp / 151 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.4 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRD |
Power (difference from average) |
177 hp / 130 kw
(+2%) |
Power to torque ratio | 62 % |
Power per passenger | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 63.2 points |
In 2002 Jeep Cherokee horsepower was between 143 and 210 hp or 105 and 154 kW.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to weight ratio in 2002 is shown in the chart.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
+32% | 29 hp / 22 kw | 37 hp / 27 kw | 61.3 points |
2.5 CRD |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+58% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 36 hp / 26 kw | 57.2 points |
2.8 TD |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+58% | 30 hp / 22 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 53.6 points |
2.8 CRDi |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
+59% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 58.2 points |
3.7 i V6 |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
+32% | 42 hp / 31 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 56.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
147 hp / 108 kw
(-15%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.3 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 CRD |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 58 % |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRDi |
Power (difference from average) |
163 hp / 120 kw
(-6%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.2 points |
Vehicle | 3.7 i V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
210 hp / 154 kw
(+21%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 42 hp / 31 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.8 points |
In 1984 Jeep Cherokee horsepower was between 86 and 192 hp or 63 and 141 kW.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to weight ratio in 1984 is shown in the chart.
Jeep Cherokee horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 i Sport |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
+40% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 48 points |
2.1 TD |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
+53% | 17 hp / 13 kw | 22 hp / 16 kw | 41 points |
2.5 i Jamboree |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
+39% | 24 hp / 18 kw | 31 hp / 23 kw | 48.8 points |
2.5 i |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
+40% | 24 hp / 17 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 47.2 points |
2.5 i SE |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
+36% | 26 hp / 19 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 52 points |
2.5 TD |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+59% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 46 points |
4.0 i |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
+41% | 36 hp / 26 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 44.5 points |
4.0 i Country |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+38% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 47.5 points |
4.0 i Sport 4WD |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
+40% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 32 hp / 24 kw | 48 points |
2.5 i SE 4WD |
127 hp / 93 kw
(-27%) |
+46% | 25 hp / 19 kw | 32 hp / 23 kw | 50.8 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 i Sport |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48 points |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
86 hp / 63 kw
(-50%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 22 hp / 16 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i Jamboree |
Power (difference from average) |
122 hp / 90 kw
(-29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.8 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Power (difference from average) |
118 hp / 87 kw
(-32%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.2 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i SE |
Power (difference from average) |
130 hp / 96 kw
(-25%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
178 hp / 131 kw
(+3%) |
Power to torque ratio | 41 % |
Power per passenger | 36 hp / 26 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 44.5 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 i Country |
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 47.5 points |
Vehicle | 4.0 i Sport 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
192 hp / 141 kw
(+11%) |
Power to torque ratio | 40 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i SE 4WD |
Power (difference from average) |
127 hp / 93 kw
(-27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 46 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 32 hp / 23 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50.8 points |