In 2007 Holden UTE horsepower was between 265 and 367 hp or 195 and 270 kW.
Holden UTE horsepower to weight ratio in 2007 is shown in the chart.
Holden UTE horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+22% | 133 hp / 98 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 73.6 points |
6.0 V8 |
367 hp / 270 kw
(+112%) |
+31% | 184 hp / 135 kw | 46 hp / 34 kw | 61.2 points |
Omega 3.6 V6 |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+22% | 133 hp / 98 kw | 44 hp / 33 kw | 73.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 133 hp / 98 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.6 points |
Vehicle | 6.0 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
367 hp / 270 kw
(+112%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 184 hp / 135 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 46 hp / 34 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 61.2 points |
Vehicle | Omega 3.6 V6 |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 22 % |
Power per passenger | 133 hp / 98 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 33 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 73.6 points |
In UTE Holden UTE horsepower was between 238 and 340 hp or 175 and 250 kW.
Holden UTE horsepower to weight ratio in UTE is shown in the chart.
Holden UTE horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
+26% | 119 hp / 88 kw | 40 hp / 29 kw | 66.1 points |
5.7 V8 |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
+28% | 170 hp / 125 kw | 43 hp / 31 kw | 59.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
238 hp / 175 kw
(+38%) |
Power to torque ratio | 26 % |
Power per passenger | 119 hp / 88 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 29 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 66.1 points |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
Power (difference from average) |
340 hp / 250 kw
(+97%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 170 hp / 125 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 43 hp / 31 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 59.6 points |
In UTE Holden UTE horsepower was between 200 and 265 hp or 147 and 195 kW.
Holden UTE horsepower to weight ratio in UTE is shown in the chart.
Holden UTE horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8i V6 |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
+34% | 100 hp / 74 kw | 33 hp / 25 kw | 52.6 points |
3.8 i V6 S |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
+39% | 112 hp / 83 kw | 37 hp / 28 kw | 58.9 points |
5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
+38% | 133 hp / 98 kw | 33 hp / 24 kw | 53 points |
5.0 i V8 HSV |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
+39% | 122 hp / 90 kw | 30 hp / 22 kw | 48.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 100 hp / 74 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 25 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.6 points |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 S |
Power (difference from average) |
224 hp / 165 kw
(+29%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 112 hp / 83 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 37 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 58.9 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 |
Power (difference from average) |
265 hp / 195 kw
(+53%) |
Power to torque ratio | 38 % |
Power per passenger | 133 hp / 98 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 53 points |
Vehicle | 5.0 i V8 HSV |
Power (difference from average) |
243 hp / 179 kw
(+40%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 122 hp / 90 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 48.6 points |