In 1987 Ford Sierra horsepower was between 67 and 220 hp or 49 and 162 kW.
Ford Sierra horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TD |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
+57% | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 41.7 points |
2.0 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
+33% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 26 hp / 19 kw | 52.5 points |
2.0i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.0 16V Cosworth 4x4 |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 16V Cosworth 4x4 CAT |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0 i |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
- | - | - | |
2.0i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.0i CAT |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.8i XR 4x4 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
2.0 RS Cosworth |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
- | - | - | |
2.9 i XR 4x4 |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
2.9 i |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+37% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 50 points |
2.3 D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
- | 13 hp / 10 kw | - | - |
1.8 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | 20 hp / 15 kw | 44.4 points |
1.6 |
72 hp / 53 kw
(-58%) |
+39% | 14 hp / 11 kw | 18 hp / 13 kw | 45 points |
1.6 i |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+24% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 56.3 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | 57 % |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 41.7 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 33 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 26 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 52.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Cosworth 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Cosworth 4x4 CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Power (difference from average) |
125 hp / 92 kw
(-28%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.8i XR 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 RS Cosworth |
Power (difference from average) |
204 hp / 150 kw
(+18%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.9 i XR 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.9 i |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 37 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 44.4 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
72 hp / 53 kw
(-58%) |
Power to torque ratio | 39 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45 points |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 56.3 points |
In 1987 Ford Sierra horsepower was between 67 and 145 hp or 49 and 107 kW.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
2.0i |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.0 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | 21 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
1.6 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
1.6 i |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
1.8 TD |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
2.9 i |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
2.3 D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
- | 13 hp / 10 kw | - | - |
2.0 XR 4x4 |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | 24 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
2.0 i 16V |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
- | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.9 i |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 XR 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
116 hp / 85 kw
(-33%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1987 Ford Sierra horsepower was between 67 and 150 hp or 49 and 110 kW.
Ford Sierra horsepower to weight ratio in 1987 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
1.6 |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
2.0i 16V |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
1.8 TD |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
2.0 4x4 |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | 24 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
2.0i |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
- | 24 hp / 18 kw | - | - |
2.0 |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
- | 21 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.9 |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
2.8 4x4 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
2.9 4x4 |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
2.3 D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
- | 13 hp / 10 kw | - | - |
2.0i CAT |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
80 hp / 59 kw
(-54%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 TD |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
120 hp / 88 kw
(-31%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
105 hp / 77 kw
(-39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.9 |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.8 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.9 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i CAT |
Power (difference from average) |
101 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1983 Ford Sierra horsepower was between 60 and 150 hp or 44 and 110 kW.
Ford Sierra horsepower to weight ratio in 1983 is shown in the chart.
Ford Sierra horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
- | 12 hp / 9 kw | - | - |
1.6 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 46.9 points |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 45 points |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
+36% | 18 hp / 13 kw | 23 hp / 17 kw | 50 points |
2.0i |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
+28% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 29 hp / 21 kw | 57.5 points |
2.3 |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
+35% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 19 hp / 14 kw | 49.6 points |
2.8 XR4i |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
+34% | 29 hp / 21 kw | 24 hp / 18 kw | 51.1 points |
2.3 D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
+52% | 13 hp / 10 kw | 17 hp / 12 kw | 29.1 points |
2.8 XR 4x4 |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
- | 30 hp / 22 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
60 hp / 44 kw
(-65%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 12 hp / 9 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 46.9 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 45 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | 36 % |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 50 points |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 28 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 57.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | 35 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 19 hp / 14 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 49.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 XR4i |
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | 34 % |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 24 hp / 18 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 51.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 13 hp / 10 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 29.1 points |
Vehicle | 2.8 XR 4x4 |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 30 hp / 22 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 1983 Ford Sierra horsepower was between 67 and 143 hp or 49 and 105 kW.
Ford Sierra horsepower to weight ratio in 1983 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 XR4i |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
- | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
1.8 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
2.0 |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
- | 18 hp / 13 kw | - | - |
2.3 |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
2.3 D |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
- | 17 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
1.6 |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
- | 15 hp / 11 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.8 XR4i |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
143 hp / 105 kw
(-17%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Power (difference from average) |
90 hp / 66 kw
(-48%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 18 hp / 13 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Power (difference from average) |
114 hp / 84 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Power (difference from average) |
67 hp / 49 kw
(-61%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 17 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Power (difference from average) |
75 hp / 55 kw
(-57%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 15 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |