In 2020 Ford S-MAX horsepower was between 165 and 240 hp or 121 and 177 kW.
Ford S-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2020 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBlue |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
+53% | 38 hp / 28 kw | 48 hp / 35 kw | - |
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+52% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | - |
1.5 EcoBoost |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+32% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
190 hp / 140 kw
(+10%) |
Power to torque ratio | 53 % |
Power per passenger | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2016 Ford S-MAX horsepower was between 150 and 240 hp or 110 and 177 kW.
Ford S-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2016 is shown in the chart.
Ford S-MAX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+30% | 48 hp / 35 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
2.0 EcoBlue |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
2.0 TDCi |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
+59% | 21 hp / 16 kw | 38 hp / 28 kw | 75 points |
1.5 EcoBoost |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
+32% | 33 hp / 24 kw | 41 hp / 30 kw | 110 points |
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
+52% | 34 hp / 25 kw | 60 hp / 44 kw | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 30 % |
Power per passenger | 48 hp / 35 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
150 hp / 110 kw
(-13%) |
Power to torque ratio | 59 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 16 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 38 hp / 28 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 75 points |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
165 hp / 121 kw
(-5%) |
Power to torque ratio | 32 % |
Power per passenger | 33 hp / 24 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 41 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 110 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | 52 % |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 60 hp / 44 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 120 points |
In 2010 Ford S-MAX horsepower was between 115 and 240 hp or 85 and 177 kW.
Ford S-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2010 is shown in the chart.
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
- | 29 hp / 21 kw | - | - |
2.0 Duratec Durashift |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
- | 21 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
- | 16 hp / 12 kw | - | - |
2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
- | 20 hp / 15 kw | - | - |
2.0 EcoBoost |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
- | 34 hp / 25 kw | - | - |
1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
- | 23 hp / 17 kw | - | - |
Vehicle | 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
200 hp / 147 kw
(+16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 29 hp / 21 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratec Durashift |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
115 hp / 85 kw
(-34%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 16 hp / 12 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 Duratorq TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Power (difference from average) |
240 hp / 177 kw
(+39%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 34 hp / 25 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi |
Power (difference from average) |
160 hp / 118 kw
(-8%) |
Power to torque ratio | - |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | - |
Power to consumption rate | - |
In 2005 Ford S-MAX horsepower was between 100 and 220 hp or 74 and 162 kW.
Ford S-MAX horsepower to weight ratio in 2005 is shown in the chart.
Ford S-MAX horsepower to CC ratio is shown in this graph
Vehicle | Power (difference from average) | Power to torque ratio | Power per passenger | Power to 1 cylinder | Power to consumption rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TDCi |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
+64% | 14 hp / 11 kw | 25 hp / 19 kw | 55.6 points |
2.0 i 16V |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
+24% | 21 hp / 15 kw | 36 hp / 27 kw | 72.5 points |
2.0 TDCi |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
+56% | 20 hp / 15 kw | 35 hp / 26 kw | 70 points |
2.2 TDCi |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
+56% | 25 hp / 18 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 79.5 points |
2.3 T |
161 hp / 118 kw
(-7%) |
+23% | 23 hp / 17 kw | 40 hp / 30 kw | 70 points |
2.5 i 20V |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
+31% | 31 hp / 23 kw | 44 hp / 32 kw | 88 points |
Vehicle | 1.8 TDCi |
---|---|
Power (difference from average) |
100 hp / 74 kw
(-42%) |
Power to torque ratio | 64 % |
Power per passenger | 14 hp / 11 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 25 hp / 19 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 55.6 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Power (difference from average) |
145 hp / 107 kw
(-16%) |
Power to torque ratio | 24 % |
Power per passenger | 21 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 36 hp / 27 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 72.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
140 hp / 103 kw
(-19%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 20 hp / 15 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 35 hp / 26 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDCi |
Power (difference from average) |
175 hp / 129 kw
(+1%) |
Power to torque ratio | 56 % |
Power per passenger | 25 hp / 18 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 79.5 points |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
Power (difference from average) |
161 hp / 118 kw
(-7%) |
Power to torque ratio | 23 % |
Power per passenger | 23 hp / 17 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 40 hp / 30 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 70 points |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Power (difference from average) |
220 hp / 162 kw
(+27%) |
Power to torque ratio | 31 % |
Power per passenger | 31 hp / 23 kw |
Power to 1 cylinder | 44 hp / 32 kw |
Power to consumption rate | 88 points |